NEWS AGENCY OF NIGERIA

C’River chieftaincy tussle: Respect S’Court judgment on selection of Obong – Traditional Council

follow and like on:
X (Twitter)
Visit Us
Follow Me
Instagram
Telegram
47 total views today

 

By Collins Yakubu-Hammer

The Cross River Traditional Council says the selection of the Obong is its exclusive responsibility and legitimacy recognized by the Constitution of the Obong’s Palace and affirmed by the Supreme Court of Nigeria.

This is contained in a statement jointly signed and issued by the Chairman, Etubom Essien Ekpenyong Effiok, and Secretary, Etubom Micah Archibong VI, for the traditional council on Sunday in Abuja.

Effiok stressed that there is the absolute need by all and sundry to respect and obey the Supreme Court Judgement concerning the selection of Obong in the state.

According to Effiok, it had become imperative to brief the public to clarify some misconceptions held by highly- placed government officials and to also set the records straight.

Effiok explained that a recent statement by a government official indicated that the state government has undertaken a judicial review of the State High Court, and Supreme Court rulings.

He added that it also indicated that the state government has undertaken the review of the Constitution of the Obong’s Palace and interfaced with Royal Fathers.

According to Effiok, the Council is not aware of any panel of Judicial or Administrative Review, adding that it has not been invited to appear or testify before such a body and as Royal Fathers.

“Above that, not having had any interface with the Governor on the matter only goes to reinforce our impression that he was only expressing his personal opinion.

“As Governor to all, we are understandably uncomfortable that he embarked on such a Judicial review and interfaced with other ‘Royal Fathers’ without any reference to the legitimate Council. This is so unfortunate.

See also  Lagos community seeks Sanwo-Olu, I-G’s intervention over attacks by land grabbers

“The high court case being relied upon by the governor has no relevance with the Supreme Court Judgement delivered on January 13, 2013.

“This is except for the fact that the four respondents contemptuously disobeyed the orders of Justice Ukpai A. lbitam.

“In reality, the judgment of the High Court by Justice Obojor A. Ogar on the 30th of January 2012, setting aside the selection and subsequent crowning of Etubom Ekpo Okon Abasi Otu, has been confirmed by both the Appellate and Supreme Courts,” Effiok said.

According to Effiok, there is absolutely no State High Court Judgement delivered on this subject matter on Sept. 25, 2022.

He explained further that such an error is a natural consequence of the independent review embarked by the governor.

“We refuse to be drawn into the tempting impression that the governor, being from the same Efik family of Adiabo Principality, as Otu, has anything to do with his conclusions.

“But this again, goes to emphasize how unsafe it was for our governor to embark upon this journey unassisted.

“Be that as it may, we wish to point out that the Supreme Court of Nigeria Judgement of 13th January 2013, set aside the selection of Otu as the Obong of Calabar on the 31st of March 2008.

“This means that from 31st March 2008 to date, there is and has been no Obong of Calabar, as we are still in the selection process.

“The same judgement directed that the selection process be conducted afresh, and the selection process can only be carried out by those who were in the Etuboms’ Council at that time.

See also  Tea sellers lament drop in patronage as prices skyrocket

“And it should be carried out according to the Constitution of Etuboms’ Traditional Council, 2002. There are only seven of us alive as of the time of the said Supreme Court Judgement, Effiok maintained.

He alleged that Etuboms who were not qualified to vote as at 31st March, 2008, and who had been capped by an impostor, hurriedly came together and purportedly re-selected Otu on January 18, 2023.

“This again was an avoidable and unnecessary fundamental flaw,” he stressed.

Effiok further said that in compliance with the Supreme Court Judgement, the Council embarked on a fresh selection process.

He added that, unfortunately, Otu, whose real name is Isukise and hails from Okobo, refused to be part of the selection process even though he was duly invited through the courier service to attend the exercise.

“In turning down the invitation to appear before the qualified Etuboms for screening and possible selection, we had no option than to screen the only other candidate presented.

“He is Dr Anthony Asuquo Ani, presented to us by the Western Calabar Traditional Rulers’ Council – Etubom. We found him qualified and have since selected and proclaimed him as the new Obong of Calabar,” he said.

Buttressing further, Effiok said the Council had notified the State Government and sought permission to conduct his coronation and for his recognition by the Cross River State Government.

“It does appear that the Governor has rejected our request and has granted explicit recognition to Otu as the Obong of Calabar.

“We want to state here without any ambiguity that the Governor’s decision is a serious challenge to the Supreme Court judgement as it is not within his power to do so.

See also  Christmas: Organisation seeks govt., stakeholders' support for improved well-being of Nigerians

“Let us state here therefore most equivocally that our Etuboms’ Council is the one recognised by the Supreme Court Judgment and Ani is the Obong of Calabar of the Efik Nation and his Traditional Coronation shall be carried out accordingly.

“We will like those who may want to know that the selection of an Obong in Efik land is exclusively the responsibility of the traditional council which has nothing to do with politics.

“As far as we are concerned, the only legitimate and recognised Traditional Council is the one headed by my humble self as the chairman,” Effiok stressed.

He then suggested that the governor should set up an independent and unbiased body to handle the situation or submit the Supreme Court’s Judgement to a court of competent jurisdiction to interpret for immediate implementation. (NAN)

Edited by Vincent Obi

follow and like on:
X (Twitter)
Visit Us
Follow Me
Instagram
Telegram

Published By

Philip Daniel Yatai
Editor/Assistant Chief Correspondent,
FCT Correspondent,
NAN Abuja.
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

You cannot copy content of this page

X
Welcome to NAN
Need help? Choose an option below and let me be your assistant.
Email SubscriptionSite SearchSend Us Email
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x