Clark urges Tinubu to review NDDC Act

Share the story

By Naomi Sharang

Chief Edwin Clark, the Leader of Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) has called on President Bola Tinubu to move for the amendment of the 2000 Act establishing the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC).

This, he said was to remove Non-Niger Delta Oil Producing States of Abia, Imo and Ondo from the nine states that make up the NDDC.

The nine states are Ondo, Edo, Delta, Bayelsa, Rivers, Imo, Abia, Cross River and Akwa Ibom.

The elder state man made the call at a news conference held in Abuja on Tuesday.

According to Clark, in the first instance, the inclusion of the three states in the commission was a political aberration.

He said: โ€œIf NDDC is to succeed, the three states should be severed from the act.

โ€œNDDC should remain the six original Niger Delta Coastal States. All other oil producing states should establish a relationship with the oil companies and Nigeria.

โ€œThis is particularly now that oil has been found in other parts of Nigeria including Anambra which is already producing 0.9%, Bauchi, Gombe, Nasarawa, Kogi, and Lagos States.

โ€œThey cannot therefore be part of NDDC.

โ€œThe NDDC Establishment Act 2000 signed by the then Senate President Chuba Okadigbo outlined the functions of the nine states and who should be the Executive Management.

โ€œOne should bear in mind that the addition of Ondo, Imo and Abia was a political aberration.

โ€œFor me to demand for the removal of Non-Niger Delta Oil Producing States from NDDC is for NDDC to succeed.

See also  Nigeria: The Changing Governance Story

โ€œThe success of the NDDC is the success of Nigeria.

โ€œThere was a reason why Imo, Abia and Ondo were brought into NDDC. Geographically they are not niger delta; they are notย  coastal states. It was a political aberration.

โ€œThe Federal Government should make arrangements to accommodate them as it is in NDCC same principle to be used not to disorganised the NDDC we want to succeed.โ€

He likened the NDDC to a liability company which also has majority shareholders and minority shareholders.

โ€œA situation where a minority shareholder in a limited liability company would like to be a managing director of the company, it is unreasonable, improper and chaotic.
โ€œThat is the main reason why I said no.

โ€œIt is not possible for a minority shareholder of even 5 per cent to be the Chairman or Managing Director of the limited liability company.

โ€œIt will be unfair and inequitable for a state that produces 1.02 per cent to produce managing director of the NDDC.

โ€œI know Nigeria as we are, the tendency will be to develop their own minority oil producing state to develop their area at the expense of the majority of oil producing states which incidentally happen to sum up to over 90 per cent of the oil.

โ€œIt is therefore, unreasonable, provocative and selfish for Imo which produces only 1.02 per cent quantum of oil to demand removal of the Chief Executives of NDDC Board that has been confirmed by the Senate.โ€(NAN) (www.nannews.ng)

==========

Edited by Benson Iziama/Sadiya Hamza


Share the story

Published by
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Follow Us On Social Media

Categories

error: Content is protected !!
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x