NEWS AGENCY OF NIGERIA
President Bola Tinubu

2025 budget and Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda

116 total views today

By Kadiri Abdulrahman, News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)

President Bola Tinubu presented the 2025 budget proposal titled “Budget of Restoration: Securing Peace, Rebuilding Prosperity” to the joint session of the National Assembly on Dec. 18, 2024.

While presenting the N49.7 trillion budget proposal, Tinubu said that it aligned with his administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda and underscores its commitment to stabilising the economy, fostering peace, and laying a foundation for sustainable prosperity.

He said that the budget proposal reinforced his administration’s roadmap to secure peace, prosperity, and hope for a greater future for the nation.

“This budget strikes at the very core of our Renewed Hope Agenda and demonstrates our commitment to stabilising the economy, improving lives, and repositioning our country for greater performance,” Tinubu said.

Stakeholders are, however, divided about the practicability of the budget proposal.

A financial expert, Prof. Uche Uwaleke, said that the budget reflected its title, with the lion shares going to defence and security (N4.91 trillion), infrastructure (N4.06 trillion), education (N3.52 trillion) and health (N2.48 trillion).

Uwaleke, of the Institute of Capital Market Studies at the Nasarawa State University, Keffi, said the budget projected that inflation would moderate to 15 per cent in 2025, while the Naira would appreciate to N1,400 per U. S. dollar.

According to him, the projection is on the back of expected reduction in importation of petroleum products.

“This is alongside increased export of finished petroleum products, bumper harvests enabled by enhanced security, as well as increased foreign exchange inflows,” he said.

He, however, expressed concern that the 2025 budget may witness a high level of off-budget funds, thereby masking the true picture of government fiscal position.

He said that recurrent (non-debt) spending made provision of N846 billion for the new minimum wage related adjustments.

He said that it was doubtful if that amount would be sufficient to accommodate the attendant bailouts to sub-nationals by the Federal Government in support of the implementation of the new minimum wage.

“These potential off-budget funds are capable of undermining government’s plan to progressively reduce deficits and borrowings over the medium term.

“For the 2025 budget not to run into a major hitch, it is important that as much as possible, all claims on public financial resources are identified and reconciled within the framework of the budget,” he said.

The expert also raised concern about financing of the N13.4 trillion deficit, in which asset sale and privatisation proceeds would contribute N312 billion, while N3.8 trillion represents multilateral/bilateral project-tied loans.

He said that the bulk of the borrowings (N9.3 trillion) would be largely discretionary and non-project tied.

“In order not to compound the already huge debt burden the country is facing, every effort should be made to ensure that all long-term funds sourced from the debt capital market are tied to self-liquidating projects.

“The budget breakdown contained in the executive proposal is meant to provide the nuts and bolts that will facilitate budget implementation and control.

“Besides the concern which the financing of the deficit raises, there are equally other weighty issues that deserve careful scrutiny by the National Assembly.

“For example, a thorough review of the line items that make up service wide votes and capital supplementation can free-up significant funds that can be channelled to other critical areas such as agriculture and solid minerals,” he said.

He urged the National Assembly to interrogate the composition and rationale for the margin for increase in costs and recurrent adjustment (N12 billion) as well as the line item tagged “contingency recurrent” (N36 billion).

” Curiously, the same figures appeared under service wide votes in 2024. Equally, under capital supplementation is a line item known as “contingency capital” (N200 billion), which also featured in 2024 budget for same amount,” he said.

The Nigerian Economic Society (NES) said that the N47.9 trillion 2025 budget was the lowest the country has had since 2018 in dollar terms.

According to Adeola Adenikinju, President of NES, though the budget is at a record high in Naira terms, the effect of Naira devaluation has shrunk its value when converted to the U.S. dollars.

“In nominal terms, the 2025 budget is the biggest Naira value budget in Nigeria’s history. However, in terms of real purchasing power, this budget is the lowest since 2018,”  he said.

Adenikinju said that the benchmark exchange rate of N1,400 though ambitious, is considered not fully grounded in the potential fiscal and monetary expectations in 2025 and deviates from major expert projections.

He said that using this benchmark may require alternative supply sources of high and more stable forex earnings for building high external reserve stocks.

An economist, Dr Chijioke Ekechukwu, said that the pegging of the budget on an exchange rate of N1,400 to dollar would dampen the optimism of Nigerians.

He said that the dollar exchange rate can get lower as the year progresses and the effect of some reforms begin to surface.

“Nigerians are still thinking that probably that rate can still come lower than N1,400, maybe N1,000.

“There is a problem with that projection because you are dampening our hope of a reduction in the exchange rate,” he said.

A policy analyst, Basil Abia, said that the projections of the 2025 budget proposal were unrealistic.

Abia said that it was only with a higher crude oil production above the current rate that the reduction of inflation to 15 per cent in 2025 could be possible.

“Now, if you say you want to do 15 per cent headline inflation rate on aggregate for 2025, you have to be able to show us that you are going to realistically drop down the core drivers, reduce their efficacy, and their frequency.

“Unfortunately, you cannot do 15 per cent headline inflation rate when you are producing less than two million barrels per day,” he said.

The Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) said that improved tax-to-Gross Domestic Product (GDP) ratio, would help to meet the ambitious N34.82 trillion revenue projection in the budget.

The LCCI Director-General, Dr Chinyere Almona, said that accelerating tax reforms, simplifying processes, and incorporating the informal sector were crucial.

She said that the country must leverage technology to expand the tax net, minimise leakages, and foster fiscal discipline.

“Fiscal discipline must complement these efforts to effectively manage the N15.81 trillion debt servicing allocation.

“Nigeria must prioritise high-impact, self-sustaining projects and explore alternative funding mechanisms, such as public-private partnerships, to keep debts within sustainable limits.

“Structural reforms are indispensable to reducing inflation to 15 per cent and stabilising the exchange rate at N1,400 to the dollar,” she said.

She said that addressing food and energy supply chain bottlenecks, fast-tracking local petroleum production projects, and fostering alignment between monetary and fiscal policies would restore confidence in the Naira and ease inflationary pressures.

“Achieving the ambitious oil production target of 2.06 million barrels daily requires decisive action to resolve pipeline vandalism, theft, and underinvestment.

“Across the three streams of operations in the oil and gas industry, a sound regulatory environment can boost activities and investments in the short term,”she said.

Almona lauded Tinubu’s attention to security, infrastructure, education, health, and agriculture to achieve macroeconomic stability and inclusive growth.

She said that the allocation of N4.91 trillion for defence was commendable compared to previous allocations.

She, however, said that the funding must be complemented with enhanced intelligence, surveillance technology, and simultaneous investment in poverty reduction and youth empowerment.

Almona said that the N4.06 trillion earmarked for infrastructure and significant allocations to education and health called for swift and transparent project execution.

According to her, while the budget outlines bold goals, these aspirations hinge on robust policy implementation, sustained execution, and coherence across government strategies.

“Beyond the figures and assumptions, budget implementation is the key performance driver.

“The 2024 budget implementation cycle extension to June 2025 should be closely watched to avoid such in the future as it can signal weak budget execution.

“We call on the National Assembly to expedite action on the appropriation debates,” she said.

As most Nigerians await the passage and operationalisation of the 2025 budget, they remain hopeful that it will effectively address rising inflation and moderate the prices of basic goods and services in the interest of the masses.

Stakeholders, however, said that a major snag to a thorough interrogation of the appropriation bill is its late presentation to the National Assembly.

They urged the lawmakers to properly scrutinise the contents of the appropriation bill before it is passed to ensure that it effectively address the yearnings of Nigerians. (NANFeatures)

**If used, credit the writer and the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)

Are the tax reform bills elixir for Nigeria’s economy?

99 total views today

By Kadiri Abdulrahman, News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)

 

President Bola Tinubu transmitted four tax reform bills to the National Assembly.

The bills are the Nigeria Tax Bill 2024, the Nigeria Tax Administration Bill, the Nigeria Revenue Service Establishment Bill, and the Joint Revenue Board Establishment Bill.

They are expected to overhaul tax administration and revenue generation in Nigeria.

The tax reform bills are products of the Taiwo Oyedele-led Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms inaugurated in August 2023, two months after Tinubu’s assumption of office.

From the onset, Tinubu had made it clear that tax reforms were a major focus of his administration, in order to lay a strong fiscal and revenue foundation for sustainable economic growth.

The bills seek to outline all taxes in the country hitherto administered by different laws and compress them into a single law.

They gave the Nigeria Revenue Service, which is expected to succeed Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS), powers to collect all national taxes.

However, shortly after the bills were presented to the National Assembly, diverse reactions and controversies started to trail them.

Some argue that the reforms are necessary to modernise the tax system, improve revenue collection, and support economic growth.

They point to the potential benefits of a simplified tax code, reduced tax rates, and increased investment incentives.

However, critics express concerns about potential negative impacts on businesses and individuals.

They argue that the reforms could increase the tax burden on certain sectors, discourage investment, and exacerbate income inequality.

The proposed changes to Value Added Tax (VAT) distribution have also sparked debate, with some regions expressing concerns about potential revenue losses.

The Northern Governors Forum is one group that kicked against the bills.

In a communique read by the forum’s chairman and Governor of Gombe state, Mohammed Yahaya, the governors specifically opposed the proposed amendment to the distribution of VAT to a derivation-based model.

They said that the proposed tax bills were not in the interest of the North and other sub-nationals.

“The contents of the bills are against the interests of the North and other sub-nationals, especially the proposed amendment to the distribution of VAT,” he said.

Yahaya said that the forum unanimously rejected the proposed tax amendments and called on members of the National Assembly to oppose the bill.

He called for equity and fairness in the implementation of all national policies and programmes to ensure that no geopolitical zone is marginalised.

The Borno State Governor, Prof. Babagana Zulum, said that if the reforms passed through the National Assembly, states would be disadvantaged, with Lagos State being the principal beneficiary.

Northern senators also called for the suspension of further legislative action on the bills, which have passed second reading in the Senate.

The lawmakers made the demand, citing potential adverse effects on Northern states.

Sen. Ali Ndume (APC-Borno), said that the Northern senators met with their governors and other leaders and agreed to advise for the withdrawal of the tax reform bills for further consultations.

Ndume said that it was in line with the suggestions of traditional rulers and the National Economic Council (NEC), adding that state assemblies in the region would also voice out their objections.

He said that some provisions in the bills clashed with the Nigerian constitution and would not stand.

The controversies around the bills have resulted to delay in them getting legislative attention.

The House of Representatives had earlier suspended debate on the bills due to public outcry and resistance from some Northern lawmakers.

The lawmakers who rejected the bills included 48 members from the North-East, 24 from Kano, and a former Governor of Sokoto State, Sen. Aminu Tambuwal, who represents Sokoto South Senatorial District.

The presidency, however, said that the four tax reform bills were not against the interest of the North or other regions.

Presidential Spokesman, Mr Bayo Onanuga, said that the reforms were designed to streamline tax administration and promote equitable economic development across the country.

Onanuga refuted claims that the bills recommended the dissolution of key federal agencies, like the National Agency for Science and Engineering Infrastructure (NASENI), Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFUND), and National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA).

“Since the public debate around the transformative tax bills began, various political actors and commentators have tried to obfuscate the facts, deliberately misinforming and misleading the public.

“Unfortunately, most reactions are not grounded in facts, reality, or sufficient knowledge of the bills.

“While some commentators have attempted to incite the people against lawmakers, others have polarised one section of the country against another.

“The tax reform bills will not make Lagos or Rivers more affluent and other parts of the country poorer, as recklessly canvassed,” he said.

According to him, the bills will not destroy the economy of any section of the country.

“Instead, they aim to enhance the quality of life for Nigerians, especially the disadvantaged, who are trying to make a living,” Onanuga said.

Also, the Director-General, National Orientation Agency (NOA), Lanre Issa-Onilu, said that the bills were not to oppress any region in the country.

Issa-Onilu said that they would ensure fiscal discipline and tax harmony, adding that they will harmonise taxation and prevent multiple taxation.

He urged members of the public to access the documents to critically peruse them before making comments in order not to misconstrue the whole essence of the reforms.

According to Uche Uwaleke, a Professor of Capital Market and the President of Capital Market Academics of Nigeria,
the proposed tax reforms represent a welcome development that will boost the capital market.

Uwaleke said that section 56 of the bills proposed a gradual reduction in the income tax on total profits of a company from the current 30 per cent to 27.5 per cent in 2025 and to 25 per cent from 2026.

“This reduction will go a long way in improving shareholders’ wealth and valuation of companies listed on the exchanges.

“In addition, what is considered as the threshold for small companies exempted from income tax has been increased from N20 million per annum, to a maximum gross turnover of N50 million per annum.

“It bears repeating that the reduced income tax rates and other generous incentives to small businesses will most likely spur business activities, and create more job opportunities essential for the growth of the capital market,” he said.

He said that one of the objectives of the bills was to simplify tax administration and reduce the number of taxes from over 60 to a single digit.

He said that this would go a long way in improving the ease of doing business in Nigeria, and also rub-off positively on the bottom line of listed companies.

“It is pertinent to note that the bills contain a number of tax incentives capable of uplifting the capital market.

“All said, the capital market in Nigeria needs fiscal incentives to gain traction.

” The implementation of the proposed tax reforms, as contained in the tax bills currently before the National Assembly, will help provide the needed elixir for the Nigerian capital market,” he said.

As the controversies rage, experts agree that the success of these tax reforms will depend on careful implementation and addressing the concerns of various stakeholders.

They suggest that finding a balance between revenue generation and economic growth will be crucial for their long-term effectiveness.(NANFeatures)

**If used, credit the writer and the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)

X
Welcome to NAN
Need help? Choose an option below and let me be your assistant.
Email SubscriptionSite SearchSend Us Email