NEWS AGENCY OF NIGERIA

Court remands Police Insp for killing officer’s wife, injuring others in Calabar

109 total views today

By Ehigimetor Igbaugba

A Chief Magistrate Court sitting in Calabar has remanded one Insp Effiong Bassey in a correctional facility for shooting dead a retired police officer’s wife and injuring two others.

Bassey was ordered to be remanded by Chief Magistrate Mercy Ene-led court during his arraignment on Monday.

The Insp was remanded following an exparte motion brought before the court by SP Otu Ubangah, legal officer in charge of the state Police command.

Ubangah said that the exparte motion became necessary as the court awaits the advice from the state Attorney General.

The SP told the court that his application was supported by a six-paragraph affidavit and a written address.

The magistrate acceded to the application and subsequently adjourned the case to April 14 for the State Department for Public Prosecution (DPP) report.

It would be recalled that the inspector had on Sunday morning opened fire on passersby without any provocation.

Three persons were hit by his bullet in the process with one confirmed dead later and the other two still receiving treatment at the time of this report.

Meanwhile, the state police command has appealed to the families of the victims and the public to remain calm as investigation into the incident continues.

In a statement by its spokesperson, SP Irene Ugbo, the command assured that justice, fairness, and equity will prevail, and the outcome of the investigation will be made public in due course. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Benson Iziama

CJ creates Insolvency Unit in Federal High Court for efficient, service delivery

116 total views today

Insolvency

By Taiye Agbaje

The Chief Judge (CJ) of the Federal High Court (FHC), Justice John Tsoho, has created an Insolvency Unit for the court to ensure efficient service delivery.

The Chief Registrar of FHC, Sulaiman Hassan, made this known in a statement on Sunday night in Abuja.

Hassan said the creation of the unit was done pursuant to the provisions of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA), 2020, and Assets, Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) Act, 2019 (as amended).

He said the creation was also in line with the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) Act, 2024, and the Bankruptcy Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2010.

“The functions of the Insolvency Unit are to oversee the effective implementation of the provisions of the above enactments as it relates to Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVA), Administration, Receivership, Winding Up and various forms of restructuring of companies.

“The unit is created in line with global best practices on Insolvency and to also provide specialised and standardised services on insolvency matters.

“It also offers insolvency practitioners, a dedicated channel for supervisory and enforcement services,” he said.

According to him, this is a milestone in the quest for modernisation and updating insolvency practice and proceedings in Nigeria.

He said the unit would also offer fast-track services required in the implementation of its mandate.(NAN)

FG rearraigns Nnamdi Kanu on amended terrorism charge

230 total views today

By Taiye Agbaje

The Federal Government on Friday, re-arraigned Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) on amended charge bordering on terrorism at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Kanu, who was re-arraigned before Justice James Omotosho, pleaded not guilty to the seven counts.

The re-arraignment followed Kanu’s message, delivered by his new counsel, Chief Kanu Agabi, former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, shortly after the case was called.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the message was titled: “Apology By Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Delivered on His Behalf by Kanu G. Agabi, SAN, CON.”

Kanu had apologised to the court, Justice Binta Nyako, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, who appeared for the Federal Government, and his own team of lawyers earlier led by Aloy Ejimakor, for all his attacks, which he said was done out of anger.

NAN reports that Kanu was earlier re-arraigned before Justice Nyako on amended 15 counts after he was brought back to the country in June 2021 from Kenya.

On April 8, 2022, the trial court struck out eight of the 15 counts in the charge. The remaining seven counts; 1, 2 3, 4, 5, 8 and 15, were later quashed by the Court of Appeal on Oct. 13, 2025.

However, the FG filed an appeal at the Supreme Court to challenge the Appeal Court judgment.

It also filed an application seeking to stay the execution of the appellate court’s judgment and the court granted the government’s request.

On Dec. 15, 2023, the Supreme Court upheld the Federal Government’s appeal challenging the verdict of the Appeal Court which dismissed the charges against Kanu.

The apex court held that Kanu must face trial at the Federal High Court on the remaining seven counts.

Before the counts were read to Kanu, Justice Omotosho made an order changing count eight to count six and count 15 to count seven.

Therefore, the IPOB leader pleaded not guilty to counts one, two, three, four, five, six and seven.

After the plea, Chief Awomolo informed the court of his readiness to conduct prosecution in line with the spirit and letters of the Supreme Court that ordered fresh trial.

He asked for a trial date to enable him to assemble his witnesses and also applied for accelerated hearing which was granted by the court.

Chief Agabi did not oppose the prosecution’s application.

Justice Omotosho, who ordered an accelerated hearing of the case, adjourned the matter until April 29, May 2 and May 6 for trial.

NAN observed that Kanu, who dressed in his usual sportswear, was cool and calm throughout the proceedings.

According to the charge, Kanu made a broadcast that was heard across Nigeria, in which he issued a threat that anyone who flouted a sit-at-home order in the south-east, should write his or her will.

The Federal Government alleged that as a result of the threat, banks, schools, markets, shopping malls, and petrol stations in the south-east have continued to shut down their businesses, with citizens and vehicular movements grounded.

It further alleged that Kanu’s broadcasts made on different dates between 2018 and 2021, incited members of the public to attack Nigerian security personnel and their family members, thereby committing an offence punishable under Section 1(2)(h) of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act, 2013.

It also alleged that Kanu directed members of IPOB “to manufacture bombs”.

The Federal Government also alleged that Kanu, between March and April 2015, “imported into Nigeria and kept in Ubulisiuzor in Ihiala LGA of Anambra, a radio transmitter known as Tram 50L, concealed in a container of used household items which you declared as used household items.”

The offence is said to be contrary to Section 47(2)(a) of Criminal Code Act Cap, C45 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Sadiya Hamza

Long detention: Committee calls for Justice minister’s urgent intervention

196 total views today

By Ebere Agozie
The Working Group on the Legal Status of Inmates in Correctional Centres has urged the Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi to intervene in cases of inmates who have stayed beyond the maximum period of imprisonment in detention.

Mr Olawale Fapohunda (SAN), the Facilitator of the group, made the call during the presentation of a report to the minister on Wednesday in Abuja.

Fapohunda noted that the first report of the group was set up to audit the legal status of inmates and has the mandate to investigate cases that are inconsistent with Section 35 of the 1999 Nigeria’s Constitution (as amended).

“This report provides a comprehensive review of the audit of the legal status of inmates in selected custodial centres in Nigeria.

“The audit exercise was carried out between January 13 and March 14 2025 which the process includes physical visitations to the custodial centres as well as interaction with inmates.

“Our mandate was mainly to focus on the legal status of inmates that have been kept in detention for a longer period than the maximum period of imprisonment prescribed for the offence.

He said that the group identified two distinct categories of inmates; inmates in remand for non capital offences who, after being arraigned, their cases were caught up by the slow judicial process and would require the active intervention of the State Ministries of Justice.

“The second category was those inmates remanded for capital offences, including terrorism.

“In one custodial centre, we discovered at least seven inmates remanded for offences relating to terrorism who have been on remand for upwards of 10 years from date of detention.

“We were unable to find any record that showed that they were brought before any court since the date of their detention’’.

Fapohunda also said that several inmates are kept in detention for periods longer than the maximum period of imprisonment prescribed for the offence because they do not have legal representation.

He noted that although the Legal Aid Council is mandated to provide free legal services to inmates without legal representation, it is presently under resourced and thus barely able to make significant difference.

“There were also inmates with life-threatening ailments who required urgent medical attention, the cost of which was outside the budget of the Correctional Services.

“There are also several minors, including those whose ages as stated on their warrants of detention were incompatible with their physical outlook’’.

He, however, noted that the findings of the working group have been subject of a number of previous interventions at the Federal and the State levels.

“The challenge has always been the absence of coordinated and sustained solutions at the Federal and State levels.

“The group noted the cynicism with which many of the remand inmates viewed the presence of the working group.

“They simply did not believe that this exercise will change their situation. In one particular custodial centre, many of the inmates decided to boycott the exercise.

“The group had to rely on documentations from the Correctional Services and the Courts.

“ It is for this reason that the group resolved to identify key concerns on a state-by-state basis, accompanied by a draft letter, signed by the Attorney-General of the federation to each State Attorney- General urging their offices to take action,” he said

The group recommended that the minister should convene a meeting of the Body of Attorneys-General, with a view to achieving a coordinated response between federal and state governments on the legal status of all inmates including but not limited to those who have overstayed without trial.

Responding, Fagbemi said the group was constituted as part of the mandate of his office to ensure access to justice and ensure that persons are not unduly detained in custodial centres.

“This is crucial to achieving the standards we have set for ourselves in our effort to reform our criminal justice system.

“The vision of Mr President is for a criminal justice system that maintains law and order, deters crime, punish offenders, while at the same time strives to rehabilitate those offenders in order to facilitate their recovery and reintegration to society.

“A common objective of these reforms is to provide sustainable solutions to the issue of inmates spending unreasonable periods in detention, enhancing conditions in correctional centres and facilitating treatment.

“Rehabilitation and re-integration of inmates. While some progress have been made in varying measures, the reality is that we still have much to do.

“I must state that laws by themselves will not solve this problem. The solution, in my view, lies in the active intervention and collaboration of federal and state institutions with a mandate on criminal justice delivery’’.

The minster expressed his concern about the inadequate resourcing for the Legal Aid Council which is a critical institution in the quest to facilitate access to justice.

“Enhanced funding for the council will be consistent with governments’ stated goals of affirming the rights of all Nigerians irrespective of social situation or economic status.

“Consequently, my office will intensify efforts aimed at achieving additional funding for the council’’, he added.

Mr Aliyu Abubakar, the Director-General of the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria expressed his appreciation for the opportunity given to the council to be part of the data collection exercise of inmates in our correctional facilities nationwide.

“The outcome of the exercise has been an eye opener even for us at the council. The sheer volume of inmates without Legal Representation is to say the least, disturbing especially for Inmates who are accused of capital offences.

“This lack of legal representation has not only resulted to over-crowding of the facilities by Awaiting Trial Inmates (ATI), but also contributed immensely in the denial of the suspects their Fundamental Human Rights as envisaged by the Constitution.

He, thereafter, appealed that the council be considered whenever the opportunity arises for Supplementary Budget by the government.(NAN)
edited by Sadiya Hamza

ECOWAS Court dismisses suit seeking creation of 6th state in Nigeria’s South-East

223 total views today

By Mark Longyen

The ECOWAS Court has dismissed a suit filed by a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) against Nigeria over the non-creation of a sixth state in the South-East geopolitical zone, unlike other zones.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the case was brought by the Incorporated Trustees of the Prince and Princess Charles Offokaja Foundation under suit number ECW/CCJ/APP/32/23.

The NGO argued that Nigeria’s failure to establish a sixth state in the South-East geopolitical zone was discriminatory towards its people and undermined the country’s geopolitical structure.

In delivering judgment, the ECOWAS Court ruled that the creation of states within the Federal Republic of Nigeria falls under the constitutional prerogative of the country.

The court unanimously dismissed the application, emphasising that Nigeria’s decision not to create an additional state in the South-East did not violate its obligations under regional and international human rights instruments.

Presiding Judge, Justice Dupe Atoki, further stated that the South-East zone had adequate representation within Nigeria’s governance structure, and there was no evidence of discriminatory intent or effect in the current geopolitical arrangement.

She added that the mere creation of an additional state does not necessarily guarantee developmental outcomes, as the applicant had claimed.

The court also noted that the applicant failed to establish a causal link between the absence of a sixth state and the alleged violations of the right to development.

“The Respondent State has not breached its obligations under Article 19 or Article 22 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, nor under Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” the court stated.

NAN reports that the applicant, registered under Nigerian law, had filed the suit under Article 19 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The NGO further argued that the alleged imbalance deprived the South-East of developmental benefits, including infrastructure, revenue allocations, and employment opportunities, in violation of Article 22 of the African Charter.

A second applicant, a Switzerland-based non-governmental organisation, was earlier removed from the proceedings due to a lack of jurisdictional basis.

The three-member panel, presided over by Justice Atoki, also included Justice Edward Asante as Judge Rapporteur and Justice Gbéri-Bè Ouattara as a member. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Tosin Kolade

Otudeko: Court adjourns for report of settlement as A-G intervenes

221 total views today

By Sandra Umeh

A Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday adjourned a case against the Chairman of Honeywell Group, Oba Otudeko, and others until May 8 for a report on settlement.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke granted the adjournment after the first defence counsel, Chief Wole Olanipekun, (SAN), informed the court that the parties were exploring a settlement.

He stated that a meeting involving all counsel had been convened at the Attorney General’s instance to facilitate a peaceful resolution.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had filed a 13-count charge against Otudeko, former First Bank Managing Director Olabisi Onasanya, former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo, and Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

The N12.3 billion case is marked FHC/L/20C/2025.

The case was initially set for arraignment on Jan. 20, but the defendants were absent, claiming they had not been served with the charge.

At the last hearing on Feb.13, defence counsel argued that the court should first hear their preliminary objections rather than proceed with the arraignment.

Delivering a ruling on Monday, Justice Aneke held that it was a settled legal principle that a defendant’s plea must be taken before any preliminary objection can be heard.

The court relied on precedents, including Onnoghen v. FRN and Bello v. FRN, and ruled that arraignment must precede any objections.

Following the ruling, Olanipekun informed the court that settlement discussions were ongoing.

He said a meeting was held on March 12 involving all parties, including the prosecution, under the Attorney General’s supervision.

He requested an adjournment for a report on the settlement.

Other defence counsel, including Messrs Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN), Olumide Fusika, (SAN), and Charles Adeosun-Phillips (SAN), supported the request.

They urged the court to grant an adjournment solely for a settlement report, without setting an arraignment date, to avoid prejudicing the discussions.

Although the prosecution’s counsel, Mrs Bilikisu Buhari, suggested an adjournment for either a settlement report or arraignment, the defence insisted on allowing settlement efforts to proceed uninterrupted.

The court granted the defence ’s request and adjourned the case until May 8 for a report on the settlement.(NAN)

Edited by Kevin Okunzuwa

A’Ibom CJ visits correctional centres, pardons 55 inmates

265 total views today

By Isaiah Eka

The Chief Judge (CJ) of Akwa Ibom, Justice Ekaette Obot, has rounded up a three-day visit to correctional centres and freed a total of 55 inmates in the state.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that 18 out of the 55 inmates were released on health grounds.

Four inmates regained freedom in Ikot Abasi custodial centre; two inmates were released in Eket centre, 11 in Ikot Ekpene centre, while 38 and one nursing mother were freed in Uyo custodial centre.

The CJ’s official visits to the custodial centres across the three senatorial districts began on Wednesday, March 12 and ended on Friday, March 14.

The chief judge observed that most of the offenders had minor offences and had overstayed in the custodial centres beyond the period they were supposed to stay, if they had been convicted.

She, however, released some on compassionate, health grounds and lack of diligence prosecution.

A typical case in Ikot-Ekpene custodual centre, was a case of one Friday Okoro, who had been in custody for over three years, without trial, for stealing his cousin’s coconuts.

The CJ, in discharging the inmates in all the centres, charged them to be of good behaviour and shun all acts that might bring them back to the custodial centre.

Obot expressed displeasure on the number of missing case files while the accused were still in custody with some staying more than the sentence of their crime if convicted.

She charged prosecutors on the need to ensure that no one was denied justice and they should not infringe on the fundamental rights of the accused.

The Controller of Correctional Centre, Akwa Ibom Command, Mr Frank Okonkwo, thanked the chief judge for her consistent visit to the facilities and the goodwill extended to the custodial centres in the state.

Okonkwo highlighted some of the challenges confronting the centres to include dilapidated facilities and lack of logistics to convey inmates to court.

He appealed to Gov. Umo Eno of Akwa Ibom to extend support and assistance to the custodial centres in the state. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Joe Idika

Prison visit: Delta Chief Judge frees inmate

226 total views today

By Eguonor Ighure

The Chief Judge of Delta, Justice Theresa Diai, has granted freedom to a 24-year-old bike rider, an inmate of the Warri Correctional Centre, Tikor Kelvin.

Kelvin regained his freedom out of a total of 336 cases of awaiting trial inmates reviewed at the Warri Correctional Centre during the first quarter prison visit for 2025.

During the visit, Justice Diai said that a lot of the cases of the inmates were at advanced stages.

She expressed hope that on her next quarter visit, most of the matters would have been concluded.

Diai said that the released inmate was freed based on the legal advice from the Department of Public Prosecutions that he had no case to answer.

She commended the judges handling the cases and the Department of Public Prosecutions for their diligence in prosecution of the matters.

Diai urged chairmen of various branches of the Nigerian Bar Association in the state to prevail on their members to take the defence in cases of inmates serious and not abandon them.

Justice Diai and her team also visited the Sapele Correctional Centre, where a total of 138 warrants were reviewed. (NAN) (www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Yinusa Ishola and Benson Iziama

Overcrowding: Legal Aid Council vows to provide representation for inmates

216 total views today

By Ibironke Ariyo

The Director of Prisons, Legal Aids Council, Olise Chukwuma, has reiterated the council’s commitment to providing legal representation for inmates lacking representation, in a bid to ensure that justice is served.

Chukwuma made the commitment in Abuja at the second public hearing on alleged corruption and other violations of the law against Nigeria Correctional Service by the Independent Investigative Panel.

He said the council partners with the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) and non-governmental organisations like Prisoners’ Rehabilitation and Welfare Action (PRAWA) to achieve the mandate.

This, he said, was geared towards promoting access to justice for all.

He expressed hope that the forthcoming Correctional Information Management System would enhance the council’s ability to retrieve details of inmates requiring legal representation.

“This will help in facilitating the provision of timely and effective legal aid,” he said.

Chukwuma noted that the council’s efforts would also help reduce overcrowding in prisons, address corruption within the correctional system, and ensure that the rights of inmates were protected.

He decried the issue of underage inmates and wrongful incarceration, stressing that the police must take responsibility for their mistakes, which often lead to the incarceration of innocent persons.

The director appealed for support from stakeholders, announcing that the Legal Aid Council would participate in the panel discussion to explore ways of improving access to justice for inmates.

Speaking, Mr Ibrahim Sesay, the Chief of Child Protection, UNICEF, Nigeria, commended the Minister of Interior for his accountability in reforming the correctional service.

Sesay outlined five key elements for consideration, including commitment to transparency and justice, solving community problems, accountability, protecting whistleblowers and institutional reforms.

“This is welcoming news and UNICEF is really looking forward to a very fair, transparent and accountable hearing,” he said.

The UNICEF chief emphasised the importance of upholding the rule of law and fundamental freedoms, even for those accused of wrongdoing.

He called for the protection of whistleblowers and the implementation of institutional reforms to create a corrupt-free system.

Also, the President, Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Mazi Afam Osigwe, lauded the ministry for its transparency in probing allegations of corruption and human rights abuses in the NCoS.

Osigwe emphasised the need for the correctional service to prioritise rehabilitation and respect for human rights, adding that incarcerated persons were vulnerable members of society who deserved to be treated with dignity.

“The correctional service is not just about keeping people in prison, but also about rehabilitating them and preparing them for reintegration into society.

“This is because the persons who are incarcerated are more vulnerable than the society and the society has a duty to ensure that justice is done to them.

“There is a need to show compassion to them and also ensure that they are treated with the highest level of human dignity.

“And so, it is the measure of the accountability of the correctional system and the Ministry of Interior that when these allegations were made, as a show of openness, the Ministry took it seriously.

“We commend the ministry for taking this bold step, and we pledge our support and cooperation to ensure that the truth is uncovered and justice is served,” Osigwe said.

The NBA president expressed hope that the public hearings would uncover the truth and ensure justice for those affected, adding that the NBA would support and cooperate with the investigative body. (NAN) (www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Yakubu Uba

Kano Emirate: Appeal Court halts Sanusi’s reinstatement, awaits Supreme Court

270 total views today

By Edith Nwapi

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has restrained the enforcement of its judgment that upheld the Kano State Government’s repeal of the 2019 Emirate Council Law, pending the determination of a suit at the Supreme Court.

The News Agency of (NAN) reports that the Court of Appeal in Kano set aside the June 20 order by Justice Abubakar Liman of the Federal High Court, Kano, nullifying the steps/actions taken by the Kano State Government pursuant to the Kano State Emirate Council (Repeal) Law 2024.

This included appointment of Sanusi Lamido Sanusi as the 16th Emir of Kano.

The court held that the order nullifying the steps taken by the Kano State Government pursuant to the 2024 Emirates Council Law was made by Justice Liman without jurisdiction.

Dissatisfied with the judgment, the Kano state government appealed to the supreme court and subsequently filed an injunction at the court of appeal.

It urged the court to stay execution of the judgment pending determination of the appeal at the Apex court.

Ruling on the injunction on Friday by a three-member panel of justices led by Justice Okon Abang in two suits marked CA/KN/27M/2025 and CA/KN/28M/2025, filed by Alhaji Aminu Babba Dan

The appeal was brought against the Kano State Government, the Speaker of the House of Assembly, the Inspector General of Police, the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, and other security agencies.

Alhaji Aminu Baba (Sarkin Dawaki Babba) through his application filed on Feb. 6, 2025, sought an order restraining the respondents from enforcing the appellate court’s judgment while an appeal was pending at the Supreme Court.

The grounds for the application were that the applicant initially instituted the suit in Kano to protect his fundamental rights.

Others are that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear and determine the suit, and there was a need to restrain the respondents from executing the judgment.

In addition, the applicant argued that the Kano State Emirate Council (Repeal) Law 2024, which was passed by the state legislature and assented to by the governor, legally led to the dissolution of the newly created emirates and the reinstatement of Sanusi Lamido Sanusi as the 16th Emir of Kano.

In a unanimous ruling, the three-member panel of Justices led by Abang held that the application was meritorious and deserving of the court’s discretion in the interest of justice.

“The law is settled. The court is enjoined to exercise its discretion judiciously and in the interest of justice,” he said.

He held that the mandatory injunction is “ordered that shall be maintain the status quo ante bellum as well as the sheriff of this court and trial court as was the position before the trial court as delivered on 13/6/2024 in the suit no. FHC/KN/CS/182/2024.”

Abang, in granting the injunction, emphasised that the applicant’s process was competent and had met all the necessary legal conditions required to obtain the relief sought.

He noted that a valid appeal was already pending before the Supreme Court, reinforcing the need to preserve the subject matter of the litigation.

In addition, the appeal court acknowledged the applicant’s legal right to protection, considering that he had served as Emir for five years before his removal.

“In my view, I hold that the balance of convenience lies in his favour. It is deserving to protect him pending the determination of the Supreme Court,” Abang ruled.

The court further restrained the respondents from enforcing the January 10 judgment that nullified the Kano State Government’s dissolution of the emirates. It also granted an order maintaining the status quo until the Supreme Court renders a final decision.

The applicant was directed to file an undertaking within 14 days in court to indemnify the respondents in damages in the event that the order not to have been made.

The appellate court’s Jan. 10 judgment had overturned an earlier ruling by the Federal High Court in Kano, which nullified the Kano State Emirate Council (Repeal) Law 2024. This law had reversed the creation of five new emirates and reinstated Sanusi Lamido Sanusi as Emir of Kano.

The Court of Appeal, in setting aside the Federal High Court’s decision, ruled that the lower court lacked jurisdiction over chieftaincy matters, which fall within the exclusive domain of the state high courts. (NAN) (www.nanews.ng)

Edited by Sadiya Hamza

X
Welcome to NAN
Need help? Choose an option below and let me be your assistant.
Email SubscriptionSite SearchSend Us Email