News Agency of Nigeria
Business recovery practitioners, Federal High Court partner on insolvency
Judiciary

Business recovery practitioners, Federal High Court partner on insolvency

By Wandoo Sombo
The Business Recovery and Insolvency Practioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) is collaborating with the Federal High Court to improve the efficiency of insolvency procedures in the country.
 The President of the association, Mr Chimezie Ihekweazu, SAN, made this known on Monday in Abuja when he led members of BRIPAN on a visit to the Chief Judge (CJ) of the court, Justice John Tsoho.
Ihekweazu said that the collaboration is aimed at enhancing business recovery administration.
He said that the association had been looking for ways to bring ailing companies back to life adding that the step the court took in establishing a solvency unit was a breath of fresh air as it would go a long way in ensuring the survival of businesses.
“Businesses should not be allowed to fail or to be liquidated but when insolvency sets in, options are provided not only for the debtors but also for the creditors as well as the regulatory institutions and those who have interest in most of the businesses.
“To explore the administration of those options with the aim of bringing those companies back to life with a view to dealing with their insolvency challenges and the profitability.
“So we are excited that the federal high court has taken this up,” he said.
Speaking, Justice Tsoho said that the issue of insolvency was a global one and Nigeria could not afford to lag behind in tackling it.
He said it was a critical aspect of the law that had to do with the economy and so it must be given every attention it deserved.
“The visit is a commendable move to promote the practice of insolvency which before now was not so well regulated and it is a critical aspect of law as it has to do with the economy of the country.
“If not well regulated, it has some kind of negative impact and so the court thought it wise to set up an insolvency unit in compliance and conformity with the Company and Allied Matters Act because they require that there should be a unit that will regulate insolvency practice.
“The unit will also ensure international best practices because the issue of insolvency is global and so Nigerians cannot be lagging behind or doing something that is quite different from what the rest of the world is doing.
“So that is a key point which BRIPAN appreciates and that is the essence of their visit because they are excited about the development because it will greatly improve the practice of insolvency which looks into company matters.
“Like when a company has to go to receivership and the emphasis really is that companies that are going under should still be managed that they just don’t die out.
“But what has prevailed in the past is that once you have a troubled company, people are more interested in rushing at the assets and once it rounds up there are devastating effects.
“People lose jobs and it creates a lot of economic crisis so that is the essence of this meeting.”
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that insolvency, in a legal context, is the inability of a person or company to pay debts that have become due.
Insolvency law provides a legal framework for dealing with the financial affairs of individuals and companies who are unable to pay their debts that have become due.
NAN also reports that the Federal High Court created an insolvency unit to oversee the effective implementation of the provisions of the enactments as they relate to Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVA), Administration, Receivership, Winding Up and various forms of restructuring of companies.
The unit would also offer insolvency practitioners a dedicated channel for supervisory and enforcement services.
It is also expected to offer fast-track services required in the implementation of its mandate. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)
Edited by Sadiya Hamza
Court strikes out Nnamdi Kanu’s N50bn suit against FG
Judiciary

Court strikes out Nnamdi Kanu’s N50bn suit against FG

By Taiye Agbaje
The Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday, struck out a N50 billion suit filed by Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), against the Federal Government.
Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a ruling, struck out the suit for lack of diligent prosecution.
When the matter was called on Thursday, neither Kanu nor the Federal Government was represented by any lawyer.
Justice Ekwo observed that in the last adjourned day, while no lawyer was in court for the IPOB leader, the Federal Government was represented in court by a counsel.
The judge, who said that the case had taken three adjournments due to no representation, consequently struck out the case.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Kanu had sued the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) as 1st and 2nd defendants in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/462/2022.
Kanu, who sued the defendants over allegations bordering on violation of his rights, alleged that he was kidnapped from Kenya and brought back to Nigeria to stand trial.
He wants the court to determine “whether the way and manner in which the plaintiff was abducted in Kenya and extraordinarily renditioned to Nigeria is consistent with extant laws.”
Specifically, he cited “the provisions of Article 12 (4) of the African Charter on human and peoples rights (ratification and enforcement) Act Cap A9 laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, and Article/Part 5 (a) of the African Charter’s principles and guidelines on human and peoples’ rights while countering terrorism in Africa.”
Kanu also wants the court to determine “whether by the operation of Section 15 of the Extradition Act Cap E25, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004, the plaintiff can be competently/legally tried for offences stated in counts 1 to 14 of the 15-count amended charge.
He said the counts “are not the offences for which he was surrendered or extraordinarily renditioned to Nigeria.”
In the originating summons, the IPOB leader is seeking 11 reliefs, including an order for his release from Department of State Services (DSS)’ custody.
He is also seeking an order restraining the defendants from taking any further step to prosecute him over criminal charge no: FHC/ABJ/CR/383/2015, currently pending before a sister court presided over by Justice Binta Nyako.
Kanu also asked the court to award the sum of N100 million to him “as the cost of this action.”
But in a notice of preliminary objection dated June 6, 2022, but filed June 27, 2022, the Federal Government and AGF prayed the court to dismiss the suit, describing it as “an abuse of court process.”
Giving one ground of argument, the defendants argued that Kanu had filed an earlier suit with similar facts before a Federal High Court, Umuahia Division in suit number: FHC/UM/CS/30/2022.
They further argued that the two defendants were parties in the suit.
According to the defendants, this renders this suit as an abuse of court process that deprived the court of the jurisdiction to entertain the instant suit.
NAN earlier reported that Aloy Ejimakor had, in one of the proceedings, told Justice Ekwo that he had filed a notice for a change of counsel.
Ejimakor told the court that he would be taking over the case from Chief Mike Ozekhome, SAN, who filed the suit on April 7, 2022. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)
Edited by Sadiya Hamza
Group tasks judiciary stakeholders on data protection, efficient justice delivery
Judiciary

Group tasks judiciary stakeholders on data protection, efficient justice delivery

 

 

 

By Adenike Ayodele

A group, Open Society Justice Reform Project (OSJRP), has called on judiciary stakeholders to recognise the critical role of data protection in justice administration.

The group’s Executive Director, Mr Sam Akpologun, made the appeal while addressing newsmen in commemoration of Data Backup Day on Thursday in Ikeja.

According to Akpologun, data backup is more than a mere Information Technology (IT) requirement; it is an essential component of judicial integrity.

He stated that poor and unreliable data backup systems had contributed to case file losses and delayed trials in courts.

OSJRP director said that protecting legal data meant protecting human rights, due process, and access to justice.

He identified the biggest challenge to effective justice delivery as the poor state of digital infrastructure and data management within the judiciary.

“Poor or unreliable data backup systems has contributed to case file losses, delay in trials and lack of transparency in judicial processes.

“Without proper data protection measures, sensitive legal documents remain susceptible to corruption, tampering, and intentional or accidental destruction,”Akpologun said.

He gave an instance of the arson that occurred during the #EndSARS protest, when the oldest judicial building in Nigeria, Igbosere Court, was razed, resulting in the destruction and loss of sensitive files and data.

According to Akpologun, the recovery of data was largely attributed to the partial digitisation of records through the Digital Information Litigation (DIL) system, which commenced in 2013.

He added that data backup played a critical role in justice administration.

“A robust data protection framework in the justice sector will prevent the loss of critical legal records due to human error, cyber attacks, or infrastructural failures.

“It will also improve efficiency by enabling quick retrieval of case files, reducing case backlogs, enhancing transparency and accountability by ensuring that court records are tamper-proof and easily auditable.

“Although the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 has been passed, the implementation of strong data protection policies in the judiciary remains weak,” he said.

The group noted that courts still operated largely with paper-based systems, as electronic case management was still in its infancy.

According to OSJRP, the slow adoption of automated court systems and secure data backup protocols has made judicial processes more cumbersome and prone to manipulation.

Akpologun said achieving sustainable access to justice required modernising judicial infrastructure.

He said, “To bridge the data protection gap, we advocate for the full implementation of digital case management systems across all levels of the judiciary.

“We recommend regular data backups of judicial records to prevent losses that could delay justice delivery.

“We also advocate for the adoption of cloud-based and secure offline storage solutions for legal documents.

“We recommend stronger enforcement of Nigeria’s Data Protection Act within the justice sector, capacity-building programmes for judicial officers on data protection best practices.

“We urge judicial stakeholders, government agencies, and civil society to recognise the critical role of data protection in justice administration.” (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Chinyere Omeire

Tribunal affirms Okpebholo’s victory, dismisses PDP, Ighodalo’s petition
Judiciary

Tribunal affirms Okpebholo’s victory, dismisses PDP, Ighodalo’s petition

By Wandoo Sombo
The Edo Governorship Election Petition Tribunal has dismissed the petition filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and its governorship candidate, Mr Asue Ighodalo, challenging the outcome of the Sept. 21, 2024 governorship election.
Delivering judgment on Wednesday in Abuja, the tribunal upheld the election of Gov. Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC), who was declared the winner by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) with 291,667 votes, defeating Ighodalo who polled 247,655 votes.
The three-member tribunal dismissed the petitioners’ petition on the grounds that they failed to prove their allegation of over voting.
The tribunal also held that the petitioners failed to call competent witnesses to speak to documentary evidence they brought to the tribunal.
This, the justices said, amounted to dumping of documents on the tribunal as they could not prove how the documents led to their allegations of over voting. (NAN) (www.nannews.ng)
Edited by Sadiya Hamza
Tribunal dismisses AA’s petition against Okpebholo’s election
Judiciary

Tribunal dismisses AA’s petition against Okpebholo’s election

By Wandoo Sombo
The Edo Governorship Election Petition Tribunal has dismissed the petition of the Action Alliance (AA) against Gov. Monday Okpebholo and the All Progressives Congress (APC).
Delivering judgment on Wednesday in Abuja, the tribunal dismissed the petition filed by AA and Mr Adekunle Omoaje for being frivolous and lacking in merit.
The three-member tribunal led by Justice Wilfred Kpochi held that Omoaje who filed the joint petition had no locus standi (legal right) to institute the case.
The tribunal further held that Omoaje did not participate in the governorship election and as such had no power to question the validity of the election.
The tribunal also ruled that Omoaje’s grouse against the election was that he was not recognised as the National Chairman of the Action Alliance for the purpose of nominating candidate for the poll.
It, however, said that his claims had no basis in the Electoral Act 2022.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Omoaje and the AA went before the tribunal asking it to rule that the declaration of Okpebholo and APC as winners of the Sept. 21, 2024 election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) was illegal, unlawful, unconditional and null and void.
Omoaje also alleged that the election was characterised by gross corruption and also that Okpebholo and APC did not win majority of lawful votes cast in the election.
He further alleged that AA was not allowed to nominate a lawful governorship candidate for the election since he did not sign the nomination form as the National Chairman of the party.
Speaking with newsmen after the judgment, counsel to the petitioners, Mr Adewale Adebayo said he was not satisfied with the judgment of the court.
He, however, said he would communicate the decision to his client and await further instructions. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)
Edited by Sadiya Hamza
Court remands Police Insp for killing officer’s wife, injuring others in Calabar
Judiciary

Court remands Police Insp for killing officer’s wife, injuring others in Calabar

By Ehigimetor Igbaugba

A Chief Magistrate Court sitting in Calabar has remanded one Insp Effiong Bassey in a correctional facility for shooting dead a retired police officer’s wife and injuring two others.

Bassey was ordered to be remanded by Chief Magistrate Mercy Ene-led court during his arraignment on Monday.

The Insp was remanded following an exparte motion brought before the court by SP Otu Ubangah, legal officer in charge of the state Police command.

Ubangah said that the exparte motion became necessary as the court awaits the advice from the state Attorney General.

The SP told the court that his application was supported by a six-paragraph affidavit and a written address.

The magistrate acceded to the application and subsequently adjourned the case to April 14 for the State Department for Public Prosecution (DPP) report.

It would be recalled that the inspector had on Sunday morning opened fire on passersby without any provocation.

Three persons were hit by his bullet in the process with one confirmed dead later and the other two still receiving treatment at the time of this report.

Meanwhile, the state police command has appealed to the families of the victims and the public to remain calm as investigation into the incident continues.

In a statement by its spokesperson, SP Irene Ugbo, the command assured that justice, fairness, and equity will prevail, and the outcome of the investigation will be made public in due course. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Benson Iziama

CJ creates Insolvency Unit in Federal High Court for efficient, service delivery
Judiciary

CJ creates Insolvency Unit in Federal High Court for efficient, service delivery

Insolvency

By Taiye Agbaje

The Chief Judge (CJ) of the Federal High Court (FHC), Justice John Tsoho, has created an Insolvency Unit for the court to ensure efficient service delivery.

The Chief Registrar of FHC, Sulaiman Hassan, made this known in a statement on Sunday night in Abuja.

Hassan said the creation of the unit was done pursuant to the provisions of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA), 2020, and Assets, Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) Act, 2019 (as amended).

He said the creation was also in line with the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC) Act, 2024, and the Bankruptcy Act, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2010.

“The functions of the Insolvency Unit are to oversee the effective implementation of the provisions of the above enactments as it relates to Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVA), Administration, Receivership, Winding Up and various forms of restructuring of companies.

“The unit is created in line with global best practices on Insolvency and to also provide specialised and standardised services on insolvency matters.

“It also offers insolvency practitioners, a dedicated channel for supervisory and enforcement services,” he said.

According to him, this is a milestone in the quest for modernisation and updating insolvency practice and proceedings in Nigeria.

He said the unit would also offer fast-track services required in the implementation of its mandate.(NAN)

FG rearraigns Nnamdi Kanu on amended terrorism charge
Judiciary

FG rearraigns Nnamdi Kanu on amended terrorism charge

By Taiye Agbaje

The Federal Government on Friday, re-arraigned Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) on amended charge bordering on terrorism at the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Kanu, who was re-arraigned before Justice James Omotosho, pleaded not guilty to the seven counts.

The re-arraignment followed Kanu’s message, delivered by his new counsel, Chief Kanu Agabi, former Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, shortly after the case was called.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the message was titled: “Apology By Mazi Nnamdi Kanu Delivered on His Behalf by Kanu G. Agabi, SAN, CON.”

Kanu had apologised to the court, Justice Binta Nyako, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo, SAN, who appeared for the Federal Government, and his own team of lawyers earlier led by Aloy Ejimakor, for all his attacks, which he said was done out of anger.

NAN reports that Kanu was earlier re-arraigned before Justice Nyako on amended 15 counts after he was brought back to the country in June 2021 from Kenya.

On April 8, 2022, the trial court struck out eight of the 15 counts in the charge. The remaining seven counts; 1, 2 3, 4, 5, 8 and 15, were later quashed by the Court of Appeal on Oct. 13, 2025.

However, the FG filed an appeal at the Supreme Court to challenge the Appeal Court judgment.

It also filed an application seeking to stay the execution of the appellate court’s judgment and the court granted the government’s request.

On Dec. 15, 2023, the Supreme Court upheld the Federal Government’s appeal challenging the verdict of the Appeal Court which dismissed the charges against Kanu.

The apex court held that Kanu must face trial at the Federal High Court on the remaining seven counts.

Before the counts were read to Kanu, Justice Omotosho made an order changing count eight to count six and count 15 to count seven.

Therefore, the IPOB leader pleaded not guilty to counts one, two, three, four, five, six and seven.

After the plea, Chief Awomolo informed the court of his readiness to conduct prosecution in line with the spirit and letters of the Supreme Court that ordered fresh trial.

He asked for a trial date to enable him to assemble his witnesses and also applied for accelerated hearing which was granted by the court.

Chief Agabi did not oppose the prosecution’s application.

Justice Omotosho, who ordered an accelerated hearing of the case, adjourned the matter until April 29, May 2 and May 6 for trial.

NAN observed that Kanu, who dressed in his usual sportswear, was cool and calm throughout the proceedings.

According to the charge, Kanu made a broadcast that was heard across Nigeria, in which he issued a threat that anyone who flouted a sit-at-home order in the south-east, should write his or her will.

The Federal Government alleged that as a result of the threat, banks, schools, markets, shopping malls, and petrol stations in the south-east have continued to shut down their businesses, with citizens and vehicular movements grounded.

It further alleged that Kanu’s broadcasts made on different dates between 2018 and 2021, incited members of the public to attack Nigerian security personnel and their family members, thereby committing an offence punishable under Section 1(2)(h) of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act, 2013.

It also alleged that Kanu directed members of IPOB “to manufacture bombs”.

The Federal Government also alleged that Kanu, between March and April 2015, “imported into Nigeria and kept in Ubulisiuzor in Ihiala LGA of Anambra, a radio transmitter known as Tram 50L, concealed in a container of used household items which you declared as used household items.”

The offence is said to be contrary to Section 47(2)(a) of Criminal Code Act Cap, C45 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Sadiya Hamza

Long detention: Committee calls for Justice minister’s urgent intervention
Judiciary

Long detention: Committee calls for Justice minister’s urgent intervention

By Ebere Agozie
The Working Group on the Legal Status of Inmates in Correctional Centres has urged the Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi to intervene in cases of inmates who have stayed beyond the maximum period of imprisonment in detention.

Mr Olawale Fapohunda (SAN), the Facilitator of the group, made the call during the presentation of a report to the minister on Wednesday in Abuja.

Fapohunda noted that the first report of the group was set up to audit the legal status of inmates and has the mandate to investigate cases that are inconsistent with Section 35 of the 1999 Nigeria’s Constitution (as amended).

“This report provides a comprehensive review of the audit of the legal status of inmates in selected custodial centres in Nigeria.

“The audit exercise was carried out between January 13 and March 14 2025 which the process includes physical visitations to the custodial centres as well as interaction with inmates.

“Our mandate was mainly to focus on the legal status of inmates that have been kept in detention for a longer period than the maximum period of imprisonment prescribed for the offence.

He said that the group identified two distinct categories of inmates; inmates in remand for non capital offences who, after being arraigned, their cases were caught up by the slow judicial process and would require the active intervention of the State Ministries of Justice.

“The second category was those inmates remanded for capital offences, including terrorism.

“In one custodial centre, we discovered at least seven inmates remanded for offences relating to terrorism who have been on remand for upwards of 10 years from date of detention.

“We were unable to find any record that showed that they were brought before any court since the date of their detention’’.

Fapohunda also said that several inmates are kept in detention for periods longer than the maximum period of imprisonment prescribed for the offence because they do not have legal representation.

He noted that although the Legal Aid Council is mandated to provide free legal services to inmates without legal representation, it is presently under resourced and thus barely able to make significant difference.

“There were also inmates with life-threatening ailments who required urgent medical attention, the cost of which was outside the budget of the Correctional Services.

“There are also several minors, including those whose ages as stated on their warrants of detention were incompatible with their physical outlook’’.

He, however, noted that the findings of the working group have been subject of a number of previous interventions at the Federal and the State levels.

“The challenge has always been the absence of coordinated and sustained solutions at the Federal and State levels.

“The group noted the cynicism with which many of the remand inmates viewed the presence of the working group.

“They simply did not believe that this exercise will change their situation. In one particular custodial centre, many of the inmates decided to boycott the exercise.

“The group had to rely on documentations from the Correctional Services and the Courts.

“ It is for this reason that the group resolved to identify key concerns on a state-by-state basis, accompanied by a draft letter, signed by the Attorney-General of the federation to each State Attorney- General urging their offices to take action,” he said

The group recommended that the minister should convene a meeting of the Body of Attorneys-General, with a view to achieving a coordinated response between federal and state governments on the legal status of all inmates including but not limited to those who have overstayed without trial.

Responding, Fagbemi said the group was constituted as part of the mandate of his office to ensure access to justice and ensure that persons are not unduly detained in custodial centres.

“This is crucial to achieving the standards we have set for ourselves in our effort to reform our criminal justice system.

“The vision of Mr President is for a criminal justice system that maintains law and order, deters crime, punish offenders, while at the same time strives to rehabilitate those offenders in order to facilitate their recovery and reintegration to society.

“A common objective of these reforms is to provide sustainable solutions to the issue of inmates spending unreasonable periods in detention, enhancing conditions in correctional centres and facilitating treatment.

“Rehabilitation and re-integration of inmates. While some progress have been made in varying measures, the reality is that we still have much to do.

“I must state that laws by themselves will not solve this problem. The solution, in my view, lies in the active intervention and collaboration of federal and state institutions with a mandate on criminal justice delivery’’.

The minster expressed his concern about the inadequate resourcing for the Legal Aid Council which is a critical institution in the quest to facilitate access to justice.

“Enhanced funding for the council will be consistent with governments’ stated goals of affirming the rights of all Nigerians irrespective of social situation or economic status.

“Consequently, my office will intensify efforts aimed at achieving additional funding for the council’’, he added.

Mr Aliyu Abubakar, the Director-General of the Legal Aid Council of Nigeria expressed his appreciation for the opportunity given to the council to be part of the data collection exercise of inmates in our correctional facilities nationwide.

“The outcome of the exercise has been an eye opener even for us at the council. The sheer volume of inmates without Legal Representation is to say the least, disturbing especially for Inmates who are accused of capital offences.

“This lack of legal representation has not only resulted to over-crowding of the facilities by Awaiting Trial Inmates (ATI), but also contributed immensely in the denial of the suspects their Fundamental Human Rights as envisaged by the Constitution.

He, thereafter, appealed that the council be considered whenever the opportunity arises for Supplementary Budget by the government.(NAN)
edited by Sadiya Hamza

ECOWAS Court dismisses suit seeking creation of 6th state in Nigeria’s South-East
Judiciary

ECOWAS Court dismisses suit seeking creation of 6th state in Nigeria’s South-East

By Mark Longyen

The ECOWAS Court has dismissed a suit filed by a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) against Nigeria over the non-creation of a sixth state in the South-East geopolitical zone, unlike other zones.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the case was brought by the Incorporated Trustees of the Prince and Princess Charles Offokaja Foundation under suit number ECW/CCJ/APP/32/23.

The NGO argued that Nigeria’s failure to establish a sixth state in the South-East geopolitical zone was discriminatory towards its people and undermined the country’s geopolitical structure.

In delivering judgment, the ECOWAS Court ruled that the creation of states within the Federal Republic of Nigeria falls under the constitutional prerogative of the country.

The court unanimously dismissed the application, emphasising that Nigeria’s decision not to create an additional state in the South-East did not violate its obligations under regional and international human rights instruments.

Presiding Judge, Justice Dupe Atoki, further stated that the South-East zone had adequate representation within Nigeria’s governance structure, and there was no evidence of discriminatory intent or effect in the current geopolitical arrangement.

She added that the mere creation of an additional state does not necessarily guarantee developmental outcomes, as the applicant had claimed.

The court also noted that the applicant failed to establish a causal link between the absence of a sixth state and the alleged violations of the right to development.

“The Respondent State has not breached its obligations under Article 19 or Article 22 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, nor under Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” the court stated.

NAN reports that the applicant, registered under Nigerian law, had filed the suit under Article 19 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and Article 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The NGO further argued that the alleged imbalance deprived the South-East of developmental benefits, including infrastructure, revenue allocations, and employment opportunities, in violation of Article 22 of the African Charter.

A second applicant, a Switzerland-based non-governmental organisation, was earlier removed from the proceedings due to a lack of jurisdictional basis.

The three-member panel, presided over by Justice Atoki, also included Justice Edward Asante as Judge Rapporteur and Justice Gbéri-Bè Ouattara as a member. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Tosin Kolade

X
Welcome to NAN
Need help? Choose an option below and let me be your assistant.
Email SubscriptionSite SearchSend Us Email