News Agency of Nigeria
Cyber bullying: Court remands Bayelsa blogger in Kuje correction facility

Cyber bullying: Court remands Bayelsa blogger in Kuje correction facility

By Taiye Agbaje

The Federal High Court, Abuja, on Thursday, ordered the remand of a Bayelsa Blogger, Mr Saint Onitsha Mienpamo, in Kuje Correctional Centre following his arraignment on alleged cyber bullying.

He was arraigned for allegations bordering on defamatory publications against the Interim Administrator of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP), Major General Barry Ndiomu (Rtd).

Justice Emeka Nwite, in a ruling after Mienpamo took his plea, directed the defendant to be remanded in the correctional centre until Dec. 4 when the trial would commence.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that while the Inspector-General (I-G) of Police is the complainant in the charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/492/23, Mienpamo is the sole defendant in the application dated Oct. 13 and filed on Oct. 16.

Mienpamo, who operates a blog, Naijalivetv.com, is standing trial on three-count charge bordering on alleged willful libel, threat, causing danger and insult against the PAP interim administrator.

When the case was called, the prosecution counsel, N.O. Eleodimio, told the court that the matter was slated for plea and that they were ready to proceed.

Mienpamo, however, pleaded not guilty to all the counts after they were read to him.

His lawyer, Terungwa Ananbe, told the court that a bail application had been filed on Mienpamo’s behalf.

But Justice Nwite said the application was not in the court records, hence, he cannot hear an application that he had not seen.

The judge consequently adjourned the matter until Dec. 4 for trial.

Mienpamo, the self-acclaimed ex-agitator, in one of the counts, is accused of sending a message/post by means of computer system network via his Facebook page ‘Mienpamo Onitsha Saint’ which he knew to be false for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, ill-will and needless anxiety to Maj-Gen. Ndiomu (Retd).

The offence is punishable under Section 24 (1) (b) of the cyber crime (Prohibition, Prevention etc) Act 2015.(NAN)(www.nannewd.ng)

==========
Edited by Sadiya Hamza

Appeal Court affirms Natasha winner of Kogi Central Senatorial Seat

Appeal Court affirms Natasha winner of Kogi Central Senatorial Seat

By Taiye Agbaje

The Court of Appeal, Abuja, on Tuesday, affirmed the election victory of Natasha Akpoti-Uduagan of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as the winner of the Kogi Central Senatorial election held in February.

The three-member panel, in a judgment, upheld the judgment of the state’s election tribunal and dismissed the appeal filed by Sen. Abubakar Ohere of the All Progressives Congress (APC).

The court agreed with the submission of counsel for Akpoti-Uduagan, Mr Johnson Usman, SAN, for being meritorious.

The appellate court also awarded the sum of N500, 000 against Ohere.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the Kogi State National and State Assemblies Tribunal, had, on Sept. 6, declared Akpoti-Uduagan the validly elected candidate for the poll.

The tribunal also invalidated the victory of Sen. Ohere.

The Tribunal Chairman, Justice K. A. Orjiako, delivered the unanimous judgment of the three-man panel, revealing that Sen. Ohere’s results were inflated in nine polling units in the Ajaokuta Local Government Area.

He added that the Independent National Electoral Commission reduced Natasha’s results in those areas and omitted the results of three other polling units meant for Natasha in the same LGA.

Following the necessary corrections, the court declared Natasha as the winner of the election with 54,074 votes, surpassing Ohere, who garnered 51,291 votes.

But unsatisfied, Ohere approached the Court of Appeal seeking to upturn the election.(NAN)

Details later….

Edited by Sadiya Hamza

Overcrowding: Ajulo advocates electronic tags for inmates

Overcrowding: Ajulo advocates electronic tags for inmates

By Femi Ogunshola

Dr Kayode Ajulo, a constitutional lawyer, has urged the Federal Government to introduce electronic tags for inmates awaiting trial in correctional centers to ease overcrowding.

Ajulo, who made the call in a statement in Abuja on Tuesday, said this would also expedite judicial processes and optimise the utilisation of government resources.

Ajulo said the current state of Nigeria’s correctional centres system was burdened by high number of inmates awaiting trial.

He said that a significant proportion of those in the centres had not yet been convicted.

According him, it not only promotes overcrowding, but also places an enormous financial strain on government resources.

He said the primary objective of his proposal was to introduce a comprehensive system of prison electronic tags for inmates awaiting trial.

Ajulo further said that to effectively implement the prison electronic tags system, step such as, needs Assessment, collaborative partnerships, legislative framework, pilot programme, capacity building, among others must be considered.

The Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) designate said the successful implementation of the prison electronic tags system would require a well-defined budget.

This, he said would represent a significant step towards addressing the challenges faced by Nigeria’s correctional centres.

Ajulo urged government to consider the proposal and initiate the necessary steps to pilot and implement the prison electronic tagging system in Nigeria. (NAN)

Edited by Remi Koleoso/Joseph Edeh

Institute trains Nigerian, Ghanaian lawyers handling cases involving capital offences

Institute trains Nigerian, Ghanaian lawyers handling cases involving capital offences

By Angela Atabo

The Makwanyane Institute Nigeria Network has offered refresher training to 20 legal practitioners on rendering quality legal services to suspects of capital offences.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the three-day train-the-trainers workshop held on Friday in Abuja was organised for criminal defense lawyers selected from Nigeria and Ghana.

It had “Defending Persons Facing the Death Penalty” as its tag and was organised in collaboration with Hope Behind Bars Africa and Centre for Legal Support and Inmate Rehabilitation (CELSIR).

Other partners included Inclusion Project and Cornell Center on the Death Penalty Worldwide.

Mrs Oluwafunke Adeoye, Founder, Hope Behind Bars Africa, said the workshop was aimed at training lawyers to effectively represent their clients facing capital punishments.

According to her, capital punishments such as the death penalty, require special skills and knowledge on the part of the legal practitioners.

“When people, who have been charged for these offences cannot afford adequate legal representation, it becomes a big problem.

“That is why we organised this workshop to enhance the expertise of the legal practitioners to handle cases effectively,” she said.

Mr Mohammed Kassim, Senior Partner, Obour, Minta and Co., Accra and a facilitator at the workshop, said that defending persons on death row is not an easy task hence the need for continuous training on relevant skills.

Kassim, who took the participants on “Strategic Litigation on Death Penalty, Investigation and Evidence Gathering Techniques”, said that lawyers representing clients facing capital punishments must be encouraged, supported and trained effectively at all times.

Also, Mrs Aladesanmi Olamiposi, Founder and Executive Director, CELSIR, urged the participants to maintain their professional ethics when representing their clients.

“Explore all possible and ethical means to extract testimony from witnesses when establishing your case in spite of many hostilities you may face.

“As a human rights lawyer, it behoves on you to maintain composure. You must stay calm.

“You must be professional and respectful even when faced with hostile or uncooperative witnesses; you must avoid arguments or confrontations,” she said.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

=========

Edited by Ijendu Iheaka and Ephraims Sheyin

Supreme Court affirms Tinubu’s Presidential victory

Supreme Court affirms Tinubu’s Presidential victory

By Ebere Agozie

The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal by former Vice President and Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, seeking to nullify the February 25, presidential election of President Bola Tinubu.

In the notice of appeal, Atiku had urged the apex court to dismiss and set aside the  September 6, judgement of the Presidential Election Petition Court, which affirmed the victory President Tinubu.

A seven-man panel of Justices led by John Okoro, in determining the first issue for determination, held that failure to transmit election results electronically did not affect the outcome of the election and could not warrant the nullification of presidential election.

The apex court also stated that Atiku did not produce alternative results of the presidential election that showed he won majority number of votes cast to rebuff the one declared by INEC.

The court resolved all the 7 issues distilled for determination in favour of Tinubu, stating that the appeal lacked merit.

The apex court thrashed all the grounds of appeal of Atiku and PDP on qualification, non-compliance with the Electoral Act, the 25% votes in FCT, and electoral malpractices.

“On the whole, having resolved all the issues against the appellant, it is my view that there is no merit in the appeal and it is hereby dismissed,” Justice Inyang Okoro said in dismissing Atiku’s appeal.

“The judgment of the court below delivered on September 6th, 2023 affirming the election of the second respondent as the duly elected President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is hereby affirmed.”

It listened to Obi’s appeal for about five minutes. In dealing with the LP’s presidential candidate on the issue of double nomination of Vice-President Kashim Shettima, the court held that the issue had been dealt with in its ruling on May 26.

“As for issue Number 4 which has to do with double nomination which was not in Atiku’s appeal, it is the view of this court that this issue having been dealt with by this court, this court cannot allow the matter to be re-litigated in this very court.

“There must be an end to litigation,” Okoro held. (NAN)

Edited by Sadiya Hamza

FIDA condemns alleged rape at Tai Solarin University of Education

FIDA condemns alleged rape at Tai Solarin University of Education

By Itohan Abara-Laserian

The International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA), Ogun  Branch, has condemned alleged recent rape incidents at the Tai Solarin University of Education in Ogun.

The Chairperson of the association, Mrs Taiwo Olusesi, made the condemnation in a statement she signed.

The statement was copied to the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Lagos on Thursday.

Olusesi said that FIDA was deeply concerned worried by the alleged incidents.

She described rape as a heinous act, and called for justice for victims.

“FIDA commends the swift action of the Ogun State Government, which has taken steps to address these incidents by promising to investigate the alleged rape cases and bring the perpetrators to justice.

“We commend this action, and urge other state governments to follow suit.

“Rape of women and girls is a serious violation of their human rights and an affront to their dignity.

“It is a crime that should not be condoned or tolerated in any form.

“As an organisation committed to protecting and promoting women’s rights, FIDA calls on governments to take concrete steps to protect women and girls from all forms of gender-based violence, including rape,” she said.

According to Olusesi, FIDA will continue to stand by victims of rape and advocate for their rights.

“We call on all stakeholders, including civil society organisations, religious leaders and traditional rulers, to join hands with us in the fight against rape and other forms of gender-based violence.

“Together, we can create a safe and equitable society for all,” she said.

NAN reports that some hoodlums reportedly raped no fewer than four female students of the university on Tuesday.

The hoodlums were said to have invaded the hostels of the students located at Abapawa, an area off the university campus. (NAN)

Edited by Ijeoma Popoola

Contradicting Judgements: Group urges NJC to beam searchlight on Plateau election tribunal

Contradicting Judgements: Group urges NJC to beam searchlight on Plateau election tribunal

By Emmanuel Oloniruha

A group, Peace and Good Governance Advocates (PEGGA) has urged the National Judicial Council (NJC) to focus its searchlight on the Plateau Election Petition Tribunal over conflicting and contradicting judgements.

The National Coordinator of the group, Mr Mani Immam made the call in a statement on Thursday in Abuja.

Immam warned that the judgments issued by the same state election petition tribunal could boomerang into a popular uprising.

He said the call was to ensure that the existing peace in plateau was not consumed through the actions of a few “errant officers and their political collaborators.”

It would be recalled that the Justice Mohammed Tukur-led tribunal overturned the victories of candidates of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), while the same tribunal led by Justice William Olamide upheld results of similar elections using different sets of rules.

The judgement by the Tukur-led panel sacked about 15 persons elected on the platform of the PDP on the basis of what it described as “lack of structure”.

This is in spite of previous judgments by other courts affirming the PDP’s victories in Plateau North Senatorial election and Bassa/Jos North federal constituency.

However, the Justice Olamide-led tribunal discountenanced the argument of the APC and dismissed the cases on the ground that the PDP validly elected its candidates having resolved the crisis that predated the emergence of the present state executive of the PDP with Chris Hassan as chairman.

The pre-election disputes within the PDP led a Federal High Court to order the party to repeat its congresses which all stakeholders participated in, leading to the emergence of Hassan as chairman in February 2022.

According to Immam, there is a limit to which the populace can endure electoral manipulations.

“We are calling on NJC to put a special focus on Plateau to prevent the state and the country from unnecessary tension, on account of contradictory and conflicting judgments.

“While we are non-partisan, we are, however, afraid that this judicial gambit is increasingly raising tension in the Plateau.”

The group leader, therefore, called on judicial authorities to be mindful of the ongoing developments so as to avoid unnecessary crisis in the state. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

==========
Edited by Joseph Edeh

AGF seeks stakeholders’ collaboration on Criminal Justice review

AGF seeks stakeholders’ collaboration on Criminal Justice review

By Ebere Agozie

Attorney-General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN has called for stakeholders’ collaboration in reviewing the implementation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA).

Fagbemi made the call at the three-day national stakeholders’ forum for the review of the implementation of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015 and Administration of Criminal Justice Laws of States on Tuesday in Abuja.

He described ACJA as one of the few areas where both states and national share common grounds; adding that the federal government is keen to see that the country’s criminal justice system is responsive.

“ACJA is one of the few key legislations that both the federal and states governments share so much common grounds, as with common worries and concerns.

“The reason for this is not far-fetched, the effectiveness and functionality of the criminal justice system, and indeed, the entire justice sector, has direct effect on the overall development, stability and sustainability of any society.

“Our ministry as a leading stakeholder in the ACJA implementation will continue to collaborate with public and private sector in achieving a balanced and inclusive judicial system.

“We will ensure that the criminal justice system of our country is more responsive to the demands of Nigerians for a simple, fast, efficient, effective, fair and trustworthy system for dispensation of justice’’.

He said passage of the ACJA by all the 36 States of the federation had provided a common ground to address the critical issues and challenges confronting Nigeria’s criminal justice system.

“It has provided us a shared platform that would enable us scale up our efforts and seek new pathways practical solutions to identified challenges’’.

Also speaking, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN), Justice Olukayode Ariwoola urged all stakeholders in judiciary to forge a common front in the implementation and administration of the ACJA 2015.

Ariwoola, who was represented by Justice Tijani Abubakar commended the federal government for initiating conversation around ACJA, noting that it would afford authorities from states and federal to interact and forge a common front.

“This forum is a right step in the right direction as it would afford authorities from federal and state to interact and seek common front in the implementation and administration of the law,” Ariwoola said.

Stakeholders who were present at the forum were the Presidents of the Court of Appeal, the Nigerian Bar Association, the Inspector General of Police, the Solicitor General of the Federation, Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences (ICPC).

Others are the Nigerian Custom Service, the Nigerian Prison Service, RoLAC, National Drug, Law and Enforcement Agency, , the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Code of Conduct Bureau and representatives from the European Union. (NAN)

Edited by Sadiya Hamza

INEC decries spate of court orders on off-cycle election

INEC decries spate of court orders on off-cycle election

By Emmanuel Oloniruha

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), has expressed concern over spate of judgments and orders from courts on the Nov. 11 governorship election in Bayelsa, Imo and Kogi.

The INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu said this on Tuesday in Abuja at the commission quarterly meeting with leaders of political parties, on the governorship election.

Yakubu that such orders could affect the cost of the election as well as pose challenge to the electoral management process.

“On the issue of candidature, the commission is concerned about the spate of recent judgments and orders of court in respect of the nomination, substitution or disqualification of candidates after all the sensitive materials have been printed.

“The reprinting of the materials in compliance with court orders within a short period of time is not only expensive but the management of the process very challenging.

“Although the commission has already published the final list of candidates for the three states, four recent court orders have compelled us to review the list.

“These changes have been reflected in the updated list of parties and candidates on our website. However, this decision is without prejudice to any pending appeal by the affected candidates or their political parties,’’ he said.

The INEC chairman also expressed concern over the spate of violence involving parties and candidates in the three states.

He also advised political parties to consider the submission of names of agents as important as the nomination of candidates for election.

He said that not all the political parties had nominated agents for all the polling units and even the collation centres in the three states.

He added that in the next few days, INEC would publish the detailed distribution of agents uploaded by all political parties for the public view.

“I am glad to report that the printing of agents’ identity cards will be completed this weekend. This will allow political parties ample time to distribute the cards to their agents.

“All the identity cards are QR Code-readable to ensure maximum security and to avoid impersonation by unaccredited persons,” he said.

Yakubu also said that INEC had delivered all non-sensitive materials for the elections to the three states, adding that the training of various categories of ad hoc staff was ongoing.

“We conducted the mock accreditation of voters and the upload of results to our IReV portal using the BVAS. Stakeholder engagements are ongoing.

“Our state offices have concluded the readiness assessment of our facilities as well as the movement of critical facilities to our 56 Local Government offices across the three states,’’ he said.

In his remarks, the IPAC Chairman, Mr Sani Yabagi urged INEC to use the November governorship election to deal with the issue of confidence deficit among the citizenry.

Sani said that the 2023 general election presented Nigeria with numerous challenges and controversies, leading to enormous challenges in the electoral processes.

“It is essential for INEC, as the custodian of our democracy, to address this issue comprehensively.

“To reaffirm citizens’ confidence, INEC must continue to demonstrate impartiality, transparency, and a commitment to conducting free, fair, and credible elections.

“This is not only a moral imperative but a necessary step towards preserving the integrity of our democratic system,’’ he said.

Yabagi said that the commission was doing its best in its preparations in spite of obvious encumbrances, adding that lot more needed to be done in ensuring that elections in country were credible and also substantially comply with the provisions of the 2022 Electoral Act.

He also called on INEC to work diligently in persuading security agencies to play by the rules of engagement and resist the temptation of being used by desperate politicians.

“The involvement of security agencies in the electoral process, when it becomes unavoidable, must be based on professionalism, neutrality, and a commitment to the defence of our democracy, rather than partisan interests.

“The citizens must feel secure in their participation in the electoral process, knowing that their safety and security are assured.

“The present precarious state of insecurity in the country and in particular the three states where the off-circle elections will be taking place poses a real threat to full participation of the citizens in the exercise,’’ he said. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Deborah Coker/Ali Baba-Inuwa

Alleged P&ID scam: EFCC opens case against fleeing Briton, James Nolan

Alleged P&ID scam: EFCC opens case against fleeing Briton, James Nolan

By Taiye Agbaje
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), on Tuesday, opened its case at the Federal High Court (FHC), Abuja, against the British National, Mr James Nolan, who jumped bail in 2022.
The EFCC’s counsel, Mr Bala Sanga, led the 1st prosecution witness (PW1), Mr Temitope Erinomo, an Assistant Chief Complaint Officer with the anti-graft agency in evidence before Justice Obiora Egwuatu.
Erinomo, who works in the Special Control Unit against Money Laundering, told the court he was part of the investigating team in the criminal charge marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/9/22 filed against Micad Project City Services Ltd (1st defendant) and Nolan (2nd defendant).
Nolan, a director in the Process and Industrial Development Limited (P&ID), jumped bail and stopped attending court proceedings since 2022.
The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) observes that though Nolan was not in court, his lawyer, Mr Michael Ajara, was in court.
Ajara, however, told the court that he was indisposed, hence, he would not be able to cross examine the PW1.
He, therefore, sought for an adjournment.
Sanga did not oppose the application and the judge subsequently adjourned the matter until Jan. 16, Jan. 17 and Jan. 18 for cross examination and trial continuation.
NAN reports that Justice Egwuatu had, on July 6, ordered a surety, Mr George Kadiri, to forfeit his N100 million bail bond to the Federal Government over his inability to produce the fleeing Briton, Nolan, in court.
Egwuatu, in a ruling, also ordered Mr Kadiri, an Igala chief and a retired civil servant, who was absent in court, to be remanded in prison custody until the payment of the N100 million.
The order followed an oral application by Sanga over non-appearance of Kadiri in court.
The surety’s lawyer,  Lisa Egwu, had tendered a medical certificate, claiming that Kadiri had a bathroom accident a week before the proceeding and was too ill to attend the court sitting.
Delivering his ruling, the judge held that the submission of the prosecution was not in doubt that Nolan had jumped bail and that he is currently in Ireland.
He held that since September 27, 2022, the surety and the defence team had been aware that the 2nd defendant (Nolan) had jumped bail.
The judge also agreed with the anti-graft agency that no significant effort had been made by the surety to ensure the attendance of the fleeing Briton in court nor had he shown to court what additional or fresh effort he intended to make in procuring his attendance in court.
Egwuatu further agreed with the prosecution that Kadiri, from the look of things did not know Nolan and that there was every likelihood that the suretyship was just a business transaction.
The judge, who held that it was the responsibility of the surety to produce the defendant in court, said this was even when a bail relationship is a transaction between the surety and the court.
The prosecuting counsel, Sanga, had earlier lamented the deliberate ploy by the defence counsel to delay the trial, saying the court had been magnanimous to the defence for several months.
NAN equally reports that Justice Ahmed Mohammed of a FHC, Abuja had, on Sept. 28, 2022, revoked the N100 million bail granted to Nolan for jumping bail.
In a ruling in another charge filed before the judge, Mohammed issued a bench warrant against Nolan and ordered that he should be arrested by security agencies, including the Interpol, anywhere he is sighted within or outside Nigeria and be produced in court to stand his trial.
The judge also directed the surety (Kadiri) to appear in court to show cause why his bail bond should not be forfeited.
Nolan was at the centre of the $9.6 billion dollars P&ID scam trial.
Nolan, also a director with Goidel Resources Limited, a Designated Non-Financial Institution, with another company, ICIL Limited, are standing trial on 16 counts bordering on money laundering before Justice Mohammed to the tune of $9.6 billion.
NAN reports on Monday that a Business and Property Court in London presided over by Justice Robin Knowles of the Commercial Courts of England and Wales quashed the $11 billion awarded against Nigeria in a case filed by the P&ID.
Judge Knowles held that the award was obtained by fraud and that what had happened in the case was contrary to public policy.
In the case marked: CL-2019-000752, the Federal Government had sought to overturn the $6.6 billion arbitration awarded in favour of P&ID in 2017. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)
Edited by Sadiya Hamza
X
Welcome to NAN
Need help? Choose an option below and let me be your assistant.
Email SubscriptionSite SearchSend Us Email