NEWS AGENCY OF NIGERIA

Man arraigned for alleged vandalism, stealing of NAN property in Awka

63 total views today

By Chimezie Anaso

The Police on Monday arraigned a 35-year-old man, Chukwuebuka Ike, before a Chief Magistrates’ Court, sitting in Amawbia, Akwa, for alleged burglary and stealing.

The defendant, whose house address was not provided, is being charged with burglary and stealing.

The prosecutor, Mr Hojo Ubanna, alleged that the defendant committed the offences on April 21, within the premises of the Federal Government-owned News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), Akwa.

Ubanna told the court that the  defendant allegedly broke into the office of NAN to steal alluminium profile valued at N200,000, but was arrested before he could escape.

The prosecutor said that the offences contravened Section 380(b) of the Criminal Code Cap 36 Vol. II Revise Laws of Anambra State of Nigeria 1991, as amended.

The defendant, however, pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The Magistrate, Mr Mike Anyadiegwu, granted the defendant bail in the sum of N200,000 with a reliable surety, who must be his relation and who must reside within the Magisterial District.

Anyadiegwu further ruled that the surety must deposit two recent passports and provide evidence of tax clearance to the Anambra Government as part of the bail conditions.

He, thereafter, adjourned the case to May 13. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Ephraims Sheyin

Traditional rulers in Nigeria

Senior lawyer wants constitutional empowerment for traditional rulers to tackle insecurity

109 total views today

By Ebere Agozie

Mr Mohammed Ndarani, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), has called on the National Assembly to amend the Nigerian constitution to empower traditional rulers to address security issues and promote participatory democracy in Nigeria.

Ndarani said this in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) while referring to his memorandum on the review of the 1999 Constitution which he submitted to the House of Representatives in Abuja.

NAN reports that Ndarani co-signed the memorandum with Dr Stephen Nyeenenwa of the Department of Philosophy, faculty of Humanities, Rivers State University.

He said that traditional rulers were the essence of a legitimate form of participatory democracy since their involvement at the grassroots go a long way towards ensuring grassroots democracy.

The SAN noted that cutting the traditional rulers off from the mainstream political administration exposed the nation’s democracy to serious abuse and corrupt manipulations.

“This is why we proposed in our submission that traditional rulers should be given such powers and functions that accord with their role as the custodians of the people’s culture and traditions.

“The empowerment of traditional rulers will address the nation’s security challenges and accountability in governance.

“Traditional rulers, as custodians of cultural heritage and moral values, are deeply embedded in their communities and possess unique insights into local dynamics.

“By leveraging their influence and authority, they can contribute significantly to efforts aimed at curbing insecurity in their various kingdoms and emirate councils.”

He noted that traditional rulers enjoyed easy accessibility to their subjects, caused mostly by their life-long reigns and hereditary status.

“They are more stable, influential, and on the average, are among the most trusted institutions in the country.

“It is therefore, imperative that at this period of our democratic growth, we involve them in political administration so that the society will benefit from the public approval ratings that they enjoy.

“Of course, they will transfer the overwhelmingly robust acceptability they enjoy to democratic leadership as a means to shape and improve their various communities.

“They will lawfully work with the police, elected politicians and other stakeholders for the peace and security of their areas. This, we believe, will foster social cohesion and stability and improve democratic consciousness and participation,” Ndarani said.

The senior lawyer said that they also proposed the establishment of a National Council of Traditional Rulers.

“The constitution should formalise and recognise the roles played by the traditional rulers in mediating between the people and the state in enhancing national identity, resolving minor conflicts and providing the needed institutional safety valve to accommodate, absorb and make up for the inadequacies of state bureaucracies.

“The traditional rulers have been on the scene since time immemorial, before the advent of colonialism. To their credit, they form and occupy a central and important role in the lives of the various people and colour their cultural identities.

“By empowering traditional institutions and ensuring accountability at all levels of government, Nigeria can navigate its way towards a safer and a more prosperous future,” he added. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

==========
Edited by Sadiya Hamza

Nigeria ripe for a new Constitution- Ndarani

115 total views today

By Ebere Agozie

A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Mohammed Ndarani has called on the National Assembly to draft a new constitution instead of panel-beating the 1999 constitution made by the military regime.

Ndarani said this in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) while reacting to his submission of a memorandum on the review of the 1999 Constitution to the House of Representatives on Saturday in Abuja.

He said the National Assembly has the power to draft an entirely new constitution, urging it to invoke its power to make a people’s constitution for Nigeria.

“Developments in this country today justify the complete overhaul and comprehensive amendment to our 1999 constitution, which was only made as an annexure to a Military Decree.

“We have attempted to beat into shape and modify it through a myriad of amendments, but these efforts have still left much to be desired as they have not yielded the desired dividends.”

The SAN said they submitted the memorandum as an affirmation of their absolute faith and confidence in the National Assembly.

“We believe that they will, without bias, collate and harmonise our views and other public views in this regard to produce a formidable document that will effectively, and truly reflect the historical, cultural, and traditional values of all Nigerians.”

He said that in their submission, they proposed a constitutional amendment that would reintroduce the Parliamentary form of government.

“We contend that the present Presidential form of government has outlived its usefulness.

“Western liberal democracy has not worked for Africa and the historical and traditional antecedents in Nigeria favour parliamentary governance.”

He disclosed that they also proposed the adoption of the six geopolitical zones to act in the capacity of regional governments.

He said they also recommendeded the independence and autonomy of the Local Government in tandem with the parliamentary system of government being proposed.

“We support and recommend the formation of State Police in all the states of the federation, which we consider long overdue.

“We recommended a comprehensive and all-embracing reform of the judiciary to make it capable of standing, performing optimally under the Parliamentary system of governance’’.

Ndarani said that they also recommended Electoral Reforms to strengthen INEC to deliver transparent, credible, free and fair elections.

“There is an overwhelming need to re-strategise, overhaul and amend or enact a new electoral act and regulations to make the process responsive to the will, yearnings and aspirations of Nigerians.

“We have submitted our own recommendations hoping that the new constitution, or such amendments, would make provision for a referendum as a condition for the passage of any law or amendments being anticipated thenceforth.

“This, in our opinion, is what will give the said constitution or act the touch of the people and imbue it with the much-needed legitimacy and bring the laws closer to the people and the people closer to the law and the lawmakers.’’(NAN)
EPA/IS
======
Edited by Ismail Abdulaziz

AFRICMIL urges lawyers to champion enactment of whistle-blower law

69 total views today
By Angela Atabo/Emmanuel Oloniruha
Abuja, April 19, 2024 (NAN) The African Centre for Media and Information Literacy (AFRICMIL) has called on lawyers to offer their professional skills in the quest for enactment of whistle-blower protection law in Nigeria.

 

The Coordinator of AFRICMI, Dr Chido Onumah, made the call at a One-day Workshop for Lawyers on Thursday in Abuja.

The theme of the workshop was “The Role of Lawyers in Promoting Whistleblowing and Whistle-blower Protection in Nigeria.”

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that AFRICMIL organised the workshop in partnership with Progressive Impact Organisation for Community Development (PRIMORG) and with support from MacArthur Foundation.

Onumah said that since 2017, under a project called Corruption Anonymous (CORA), AFRICMIL had been working with the Presidential Initiative on Continuous Audit (PICA) and other stakeholders.

He said it was to promote the whistleblowing policy introduced by the Federal Government in December 2016.

“As you all know, whistleblowing is a legal process. At one stage or another, a whistle-blower will require the services of a lawyer.

“We are mindful of this fact, and that is why over the years we have been collaborating with lawyers, especially lawyers who are interested in public interest litigation and defending citizens who suffer retaliation for blowing the whistle.

“Apart from defending victimised whistle-blowers, we are trying to cultivate a team of lawyers who will offer their professional skills in the quest for the enactment of a long-overdue whistle-blower protection law.

“We already have an MOU with SERAP in this regard; but we would like to work with more lawyers: that is the purpose of this workshop.’’

Onumah said the workshop was designed to enhance the participants’ understanding of the whistleblowing ecosystem and its general principles and best practices.

He said it was also aimed at making them understand the operations of the Nigerian whistleblowing policy, the nature and scope of the draft Whistle-blower Protection Bill approved by the Federal Executive Council but yet to be passed into law.

“We expect that at the end of the workshop, we will all be the richer for it; with a stronger resolve to protect our compatriots who become victims of impunity and abuse of power only because they made disclosures against corrupt and other illegal practices that threaten society’s well-being, “he said.

The President, Public Interest Lawyers’ League (PILL), Mr Abdul Mahmud, a legal practitioner, in his presentation, said whistleblowing was often regulated by law to protect individuals who report wrongdoing or misconduct within organisations.

Mahmud said that a whistle-blower was someone who exposed information or activities that were illegal, unethical, or not in accordance with regulations within an organisation or government entity.

He however, said that there was no specific law that regulated whistleblowing in Nigeria.

“However, Section 39 of the Constitution 1999 provides the constitutional framework for the protection of whistle-blowers as it guarantees the right of imparting information without interference.

“Lawyers play a crucial role in promoting whistleblowing and protecting whistle-blowers in Nigeria by providing legal advice, representation, and advocacy.

“Lawyers can also engage in legal education, providing confidential consultations, advocacy assisting with reporting procedures, promoting legislative reforms among others,’’ he said.

Mahmud said by employing the strategies, lawyers would  play a crucial role in protecting whistle-blowers in Nigeria and foster a culture of accountability and transparency.

Also speaking, Mr Johnson Oludare, Deputy Director, Federal Ministry of Finance, said although the whistleblowing policy had recorded some gains, it still had a number of challenges.

Oludare said challenges included lack of involvement by Nigerians as they had yet to take total ownership of the fight against corruption.

He said another challenge was the lack of a legal framework because at present, there was no legislation of the National Assembly backing Whistle-Blowing Policy in Nigeria.

Oludare said that efforts were ongoing to get a law.

He listed fear of victimisation, lack of proper organisation on the responsibility of all components of the whistle blowers units, inadequate compensation for whistleblowers and specific protection for the whistle-blower as some of the challenges.

Oludare said that all whistle-blowers should be adequately rewarded and made heroes and heroines in their communities to encourage more whistle-blowers to come forward. (NAN)

Edited by Chidinma Agu and Chijioke Okoronkwo

Yahaya Bello, a wanted man by EFCC

Alleged fraud: EFCC declares Yahaya Bello wanted

126 total views today

By Isaac Aregbesola

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC) on Thursday, declared a former governor of Kogi, Alhaji Yahaya Bello wanted in connection with alleged money laundering.

This is contained in a notice posted on the commission’s website.

“The public is hereby notified that Yahaya Adoza Bello (former Governor of Kogi State), whose photograph appears above is wanted by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission in connection with alleged case of Money Laundering to the tune of N80,246,470,089.88.

“Bello, a 48-year-old Ebira man, is a native of Okenne Local Government of Kogi State.

“His last known address is: 9, Benghazi Street, Wuse Zone 4, Abuja.”

The notice further asked any one with useful information about the former governor’s whereabouts to contact any of the commission’s offices across the country.

The anti-graft commission had made unsuccessful attempt to arrest Bello on Wednesday when its operatives laid siege to his residence in Abuja.

A High Court sitting in Lokoja had on Feb. 9, restrained the EFCC from arresting, detaining or prosecuting the former governor.

The EFCC was, however, granted a warrant of arrest by a Federal High Court in Abuja to apprehend him.

The commission was at the court on Thursday for arraignment of the former governor, who was however absent.

The court, however, adjourned until April 23 for ruling in an application by EFCC, seeking a substituted service of the charge on the former governor.

Justice Emeka Nwite fixed the date after counsel for the EFCC, Kemi Pinheiro, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and the ex-governor’s lawyer, Abdulwahab Mohammed, also a SAN, presented their arguments for and against the oral application.

When the matter was called for the arraignment of Bello on a 19-count money laundering charge, the former governor was not in court.

However, his team of lawyers, including Adeola Adedipe, SAN, was in court.

Mohammed, who announced appearance for Bello, challenged the validity of the charge on the grounds that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter on the one hand and to have issued the arrest warrant against his client on the other hand.

He informed the court that a preliminary objection had already been filed before the court to the effect.

The lawyer, who urged the court to vacate the arrest warrant order, said a High Court of Kogi had on Feb. 9 restrained the anti-graft agency from arresting, detaining or prosecuting Bello.

He said the ruling was on a fundamental rights suit filed by the former governor and that the EFCC was a party in the matter.

He added that two of the senior advocates representing the anti-graft agency in the instant charge were also in the matter.

Mohammed said the order was challenged by the EFCC at the Court of Appeal and the matter was already fixed for hearing.

He stressed that the arrest warrant the commission surreptitiously got from the court was an attempt to bring the court on collision course with the Appeal Court.

Bello’s lawyer, who insisted that the issue of jurisdiction was a threshold which the court must address first, argued that the charge ought not to have been filed in view of the appeal.

Mohammed disagreed with Pinheiro’s submission that the court should direct that he should be served with the charge in the open court since he represented Bello.

The senior lawyer said he was not authorised to receive the charge on his client’s behalf.

He argued that if the commission could not serve Bello personally with the charge, they should formally apply so that the defendant could respond accordingly.

Besides, he insisted that their objection to the whole charge and the arrest warrant on the grounds that it lacked jurisdiction, had not been dealt it.

He urged the court to refuse EFCC’s application.

However, EFCC’s lawyer disagreed with Mohammed’s submission.

Pinheiro said the matter was fixed for Bello’s arraignment and Mohammed, having announced appearance for the ex-governor, could be served in the open court for the matter to proceed.

Justice Nwite adjourned the matter until April 23 for ruling on substituted service.

The judge had, on Wednesday ordered that EFCC should be issued a warrant for the arrest of Bello in spite of the subsisting judgment by a Kogi High Court restraining the commission from arresting, detaining, or prosecuting him.

The court had also ordered that the ex-governor be produced in court today. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

==========
Edited by Maharazu Ahmed

Court to hear ex-minister Olu Agunloye’s N1bn suit against EFCC May 9

82 total views today

‘s Mediiye agbaje

By Taiye Agbaje

A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Thursday, fixed May 9 for hearing in a N1 billion suit filed by Dr Olu Agunloye, former Minister of Power and Steel under ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo, against the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Justice Emeka Nwite fixed the date after EFCC’s lawyer, Abba Mohammed, sought an adjournment to enable him regularise his processes before the court.

When the matter was called for report of service, the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), who is the 2nd defendant in the suit, was not represented in court.

Justice Nwite then asked Agunloye’s counsel, Adeola Adedipe, SAN, if the AGF had been served and he responded in affirmative.

The senior lawyer told the court that though the EFCC filed a motion to regularise their processes, he was not opposing the application.

Mohammed, however, applied that the court file be given to him to verify if their processes were in the court record but Adedipe objected to the request.

“I object to that my lord. I have never seen such practice before where a court file is shown to a party,” he said.

Adedipe further argued that since the matter was ripe for hearing, he sought the leave of court to proceed on the matter if the anti-graft agency’s lawyer had no defence.

But Mohammed prayed the court for an adjournment to enable him put their house in order, even as the AGF was not represented in court.

The judge, who adjourned the matter until May 9 for hearing, directed that the hearing notice be served on the 2nd defendant.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) had, on March 1, reported that the ex-minister had filed the suit against EFCC over allegations that the commission published his name on its website’s wanted list.

Agunloye, in the suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/167/2024 and filed by his team of lawyers led by Adedipe, also joined the AGF as 2nd defendant.

In the originating summons, dated and filed Feb. 8, the ex-minister sought six reliefs, including a declaration that the EFCC cannot lawfully exercise its discretion, powers and or functions under Sections 1(2\(c\, 6, 7, 13 of the EFCC Act, 2004, ditto Section 4 of the Police Act 2020, by declaring him wanted on its official website or any other related platform.

Agunloye said this was without recourse to any safeguard in Sections 34({1)(a), 35, 37, 39, 41 and 42 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), including a judicial intervention, order or leave of court pursuant to Sections 1(1), 8(1) & 42(2) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA), 2015.

He, therefore, sought an order for the EFCC, its agents, privies, representatives and other related affiliates to forthwith remove his picture, name, references, details and or particulars from the wanted list published on its official website or any other related platform.

He also sought a perpetual injunction restraining the EFCC and the AGF, “both jointly or severally, whether by themselves or their staff, from further declaring the plaintiff wanted.

“General damages of one billion baira (N1, 000, 000, 000 00) against the defendants, especially the 1st defendant

“Cost of this action.”(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

TOA/SH

=======
edited by Sadiya Hamza

Court symbol

Court adjourns Nnamdi Kanu’s N1bn suit against FG for adoption of processes

78 total views today

By Taiye Agbaje

A Federal High Court, Abuja has adjourned a N1 billion suit filed by Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), against the Federal Government and Department of State Services (DSS) until April 23 for adoption of processes.

Justice James Omotosho adjourned the matter after lawyer to the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Gbenga Oladimeji, filed a process shortly before the hearing commenced.

Justice Omotosho, who was unhappy over Oladimeji’s delay in filing the motion, subsequently adjourned the matter for adoption of processes.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that, on April 18, Oladimeji had informed the court that they were yet to file their response on behalf of 1st and 2nd defendants because he was only being notified about the process though they had been served since March 6.

But the DSS lawyer, Abdul Danlami, said they had filed their counter affidavit in opposition to Kanu’s application filed by his counsel, Aloy Ejimakor.

Ejimakor then sought an adjournment to enable him file additional affidavit in response to fresh issues raised by the DSS in their counter affidavit and the judge adjourned the matter until today for adoption of processes.

NAN reports that Kanu, through his lawyer, Ejimakor, had filed the instant suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/1633/2023 for the enforcement of his fundamental rights while in detention.

In the originating motion dated and filed on Dec. 4, 2023, the applicant sued the Federal Republic of Nigeria (FRN), AGF, DSS and its DG as 1st to 4th respondents respectively.

The suit was filed pursuant to Order II, Rules 1 & 2 of the Fundamental Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules 2009, among others.

In the motion, the detained IPOB leader prayed for eight reliefs.

He sought “a declaration that the respondents’ act of forcible seizure and photocopying of confidential legal documents pertaining to facilitating the preparation of his defence which were brought to him at the respondents’ detention facility by his lawyers, amounted to denial of his rights to be defended by legal practitioners of his own choice.

He also sought a declaration on the respondents’ act of refusing or preventing his counsel from taking notes of details of counsel’s professional discussions/consultations with him at DSS detention.

This, he said, amounted to denial of his right to be given adequate facilities for the preparation of his defence by legal practitioners of his own choice.

He also sought a declaration that the respondents’ act of eavesdropping on his confidential consultations/conversations with his lawyers on matters relating to preparation of his defence during the lawyers’ visitations amounted to denial of applicant’s right to be given adequate facilities for the preparation of his defence and to be defended by legal practitioners of his own choice, among others.

Kanu, therefore, sought an order of injunction restraining and prohibiting the respondents from their act of forcible seizure and photocopying of confidential legal documents brought to him at the detention facility by his lawyers.

“An order of injunction restraining and prohibiting the respondents from their act of refusing or preventing the applicant’s counsel from taking notes of details of counsel’s professional discussions/consultations with the applicant during the counsel’s visitation with the applicant at the premises of respondents’ detention facility.

He is also seeking an order mandating the respondents to jointly and severally pay the sum of N1 billion as damages for the mental, emotional, psychological and other damages he suffered as a result of the his rights’ breach.

But in a counter affidavit dated and filed by the DSS on March 12, the security outfit denied allegations levelled against it.

In the application deposed to by Yamuje Benye, a Legal Department staff, he said 11 paragraphs in Kanu’s affidavit were untrue.

He averred that Kanu was in safe and secured custody of the DSS and that he was not detained in solitary confinement.

According to Benye, the applicant (Kanu) is allowed access to his family members and team of lawyers on his visiting days without any hindrance whatsoever.

He argued that the IPOB leader was permitted to interact and consult with his lawyers on his visiting days without any interference.

He said at no material time did any DSS personnel seized or confiscated documents brought to Kanu by his lawyers or any other person.

He added that their personnel never denied Kanu’s lawyers the professional liberty to perform their lawful duty of discussing, consulting and interacting with him.

“Applicant’s counsel are allowed to moderate size notes or pads for the visit but exchange of materials that promotes the IPOB ideals (subject matter of applicant’s criminal trial) were strongly resisted and refused.

Applicant has consistently requested that various prayer books and religious materials be brought to him as part of his fundamental human right,” he said.

Benye averred that Justice Binta Nyako, who is presiding over Kanu’s criminal trial, had always maintained that visit to him should always be under supervision as it is the best practice all over the world.

According to him, the applicant (Kanu) and his counsel, were permitted to consult and interact on visiting days in one of the best interview facilities of the State Security Service (SSS) to ensure maximum comfort of applicant and his visitor(s).

The official, who denied allegations that the personnel usually record their interaction during visit, said “there is no basis for eavesdropping and recording of their conversations.”

He said in line with the Service Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) of the State Security Service, all visitors to her facility are subjected to normal routine security checks and items in their possession scanned.

According to him, this is to avoid unauthorised materials making their way into the facility.

Benye said the instant suit was an abuse of court process, Kanu, having argued same issues before Justice Nyako and the matter reserved for judgment.(NAN)(www.nannnews.ng)

=========
Edited by Sadiya Hamza

Court symbol

APC: Court halts Ganduje’s suspension, orders return to status quo

52 total views today

By Aminu Garko

A Federal High Court in Kano, has halted the suspension of National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Abdullahi Umar Ganduje by his ward.

The order came on Wednesday after the the APC chieftain filed an ex parte motion seeking to enforce his fundamental right to fair hearing.

The Police, Department of State Services (DSS), Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), and nine other individuals are the respondents in the application.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) recalls that on April 16, APC executives in Dawakin ward, Tofa Local Government Area in Kano State suspended Ganduje over alleged corruption.

In a counter move, the State Working Committee of the APC in Kano State nullified the suspension and punished the ward executives.

However, Usman Na’Abba, a Kano High Court judge upheld Ganduje’s suspension.

In the ex parte order delivered on Wednesday by the Federal High Court and made available to newsmen on Thursday Justice Mohammed Liman halted the implementation of the suspension until the case is heard and determined.

“All the respondents, their servants, agents or privies are hereby restrained from implementing and/or giving effect to the purported decision reached during the purported emergency meeting of the alleged executive members of APC Ganduje Ward, held at Ganduje Ward of Dawakin Tofa LGA.

“That all the parties are hereby mandated to maintain status quo before the purported emergency meeting of the alleged executive members of APC Ganduje Ward.

“They are to stay action in respect of this matter pending the hearing and determination of the substantive application,” Liman said.

The judge subsequently fixed April 30 to hear Ganduje’s appeal. (NAN) (www.nannews.ng)

Edited by Uche Anunne

Abdullahi Ganduje

Kano High Court affirms Ganduje’s suspension

84 total views today

By Aminu Garko

A Kano State High Court has restrained the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Dr Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, from parading himself as a member of the party.

Justice Usman Malam Na’abba, made the order on Wednesday following an exparte motion filed by Dr Ibrahim Sa’ad on behalf of two APC executive members of Ganduje ward, Dawakin-Tofa Local Government Area.

The plaintiffs are the party’s Assistant Secretary, Laminu Sani and its Legal Adviser, Haladu Gwanjo.

The duo are among the nine ward executive members who suspended Ganduje from the party at the ward level, two days ago.

The respondents in the case included APC as a party, APC National Working Committee (NWC), APC Kano State Working Committee (KSWC) and Dr Abdullahi Umar Ganduje.

Granting the motion, Na’abba made an order restraining Ganduje from parading himself as APC National Chairman.

The court further made an order directing Ganduje to henceforth, desist from presiding over all affairs of the APC National Working Committee (NWC).

The court directed the respondents to henceforth maintain status quo ante belum as from April 15, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit on April, 30.

Justice Na’abba also granted the plaintiff’s prayer which ordered the APC SWC from interfering with the legally and validly considered decision of executives of Ganduje ward, essentially on action endorsed by two third majority of the executives as provided by the party constitution.

“An order is hereby granted directing all parties in the suit APC (1st), APC National Working Committee (2nd), Kano State Working Committee APC (3rd), Dr Abdullah Ganduje (4th), to maintain status quo ante belum as of April 15, 2024.

“The order thereby restraining the 1st respondent (APC) from recognising the 4th respondent (Ganduje) as member of APC and prohibiting the 4th respondent (Ganduje) from presiding over any affairs of the NWC and restraining the state Working Committee from interfering with the legal and valid decision of the ward executives of Ganduje ward.

“That the 4th respondent (Ganduje) is prohibited from parading himself as member of APC or doing any act that may portray him or seem to be a member of APC, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit”.

It will be recalled that nine members of the Ganduje ward, proclaimed the suspension of the national chairman of APC over the allegation of corruption slammed on him by the Kano state government.

The nine APC executives said they were prompted to act following a petition written by one Ja’afaru Adamu, a member of APC from Ganduje’s polling unit.

In the petition, Adamu made allegations of corruption charges against the former governor just as he urged the ward leaders to investigate the matter to redeem the dented image of the party against the backdrop of President Bola Tinubu’s fight against corruption.

Following the failure of the Ward Chairman and Secretary to act on the petition, nine members of the executive led by the legal adviser, acted and took the decision that led to the suspension Ganduje. (NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

=============
Edited by Kevin Okunzuwa/Vincent Obi

Justice symbol

Court transfers suit against Catholic priests, others to Lagos

116 total views today

By Taiye Agbaje

A Federal High Court, Abuja, on Tuesday, transferred a fundamental rights enforcement suit filed against Catholic Archbishop of Lagos, Most Rev. Alfred Adewale Martins, and others to Lagos division of the court for adjudication.

Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a judgment, held that it was in the interest of justice to transfer the matter since majority of the parties reside in Lagos.

“I find that apart from the 4th defendant whose residence this court can take judicial notice as being in Abuja, the applicant, by the averments in the affidavit in support of this case, is in Enugu; the 1st respondent resides in Lagos, the 2nd respondent resides in Lagos, the 3rd respondent by the averments in his counter-affidavit, resides in Lagos, and the 5th respondent resides in Lagos.

“With this evidence, I am of the opinion that this matter ought to have been filed in the Lagos Division of this court.

“The expenditure imposed on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 5th respondents to defend this case in Abuja is not such that ought to be ignored.

“Furthermore, as much as this suit is by affidavit evidence, the court must avoid a situation where in the consideration of the said affidavit evidence, it finds the need to invite parties to give oral evidence to resolve any area of conflict thereof.

“Parties must be within the relevant territorial jurisdiction to avoid miscarriage of justice being occasioned on any of them.

“It is in the interest of justice that this matter, even though commenced in this division, be heard in Lagos division.

“I therefore make an order pursuant to the provision of Section 22 (1) of the Federal High Court transferring this case to Lagos division of this court forthwith for adjudication.

“This is the order of this court,” the judge declared.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the applicant, Rev. Fr. Peter Ronald Scott, through his lawyer, Chibuzor Obiajunwa, had filed the suit to seek the protection of court against alleged threat of arrest and detention by the police.

In the originating motion on notice marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/473/2022 and filed on April 8, 2022, Scott sued Most Rev. Martins, Rev. Fr. David Kipkrono, Mr Athoney Onwudiwe Ebo, Inspector-General (I-G) of Police, and Commissioner of Police, Lagos State, as 1st to 5th respondents respectively.

He sought a declaration that Martins, Kipkrono and Ebo (1st to 3rd respondents) are not entitled to use I-G or the police commissioner (4th or 5th respondent) “to arrest or detain him in the guise of a police investigation over the decision of Mr Ebo Lawrence Chimaobi (3rd respondent’s son) to pursue his vocation abroad and all circumstances connected thereto.

“An order of the court perpetually restraining the 1st to 3rd respondents from using the 4th and/or the 5th respondents, their agents, privies, associates, agents or any member of his congregation in the guise of a police investigation over the decision of Mr Ebo Lawrence Chimaobi to pursue his vocation abroad and all circumstances connected thereto. ”

Scott, in his affidavit, averred that he was duly authorised to reside in Nigeria and presently in charge of the Nigerian Priory of a Catholic Congregation known as the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), and was duly registered as an incorporated trusteeship.

According to him, SSPX was founded in 1970 by Archbishop Marcel Francois Marie Joseph Lefebvre and against the wishes of the mainstream Catholic Church in 1988, and he consecrated four bishops to continue his work.

“This resulted in his excommunication as well as the society from the mainstream Catholic Church, till date,” he said.

Scott, therefore, alleged that Kipkrono, the parish priest of Saint Matthew Catholic Church, Amukoko, Lagos, and Lawrence’s father had accused him of kidnapping Lawrence, a 23-year old son, who completed his Electrical and Electronic Engineering degree from the Federal University of Technology, Owerri, in 2020, and proceeded to carry out his National Service programme at the SSPX’s present headquarters in Nigeria.

He alleged that they had threatened to get him arrested because Lawrence had deeply desired to become an SSPX priest and in January 2022, he was accepted into the society’s seminary and also obtained a religious visa to Argentina.

But in a counter affidavit deposed to by Mr Ebo, who is Lawrence’s father, the 1st to 3rd respondents disagreed with Scott.

Ebo alleged that Lawrence was indoctrinated into Scott’s church during his first year in the university between the age of 15 and 16.

He averred that upon completion of his degree programme, Lawrence was posted to Abuja for his National Youth Service but was advised and threatened by Scott to work his posting to Enugu State so as to continue the teachings and indoctrination into Scott’s church.

Ebo said though he tried to get his son to work with a specialised company, he said Scott successfully convinced him (Lawrence) to work with the church.(NAN)

Edited by Sadiya Hamza

X
Welcome to NAN
Need help? Choose an option below and let me be your assistant.
Email SubscriptionSite SearchSend Us Email