News Agency of Nigeria
Are proven cases of intimidation, sexual abuse by elites unpunishable?

Are proven cases of intimidation, sexual abuse by elites unpunishable?

By Patricia Amogu

Political status shapes both the process and outcome of sexual misconduct cases anywhere in the world
While sexual violence is a widespread issue affecting many sectors of society, a particularly troubling dimension lies in the involvement of the elite — those in positions of power and influence who have allegedly used their authority to perpetrate or shield themselves from the consequences of such abuse.
While some systems hold elites to account, others reveal persistent gaps – especially where procedural protections become barriers to justice.
Former President of Nicaragua, Daniel Ortega, was accused by his stepdaughter of prolonged sexual abuse, but he attempted to claim parliamentary immunity.
He publicly denied the allegations, and legal immunity was asserted. So, no criminal trial proceeded.
However, in December 2010, former Israeli President Moshe Katsav was convicted on charges of rape, sexual abuse, and obstruction of justice.
He was sentenced to seven years in prison and served five.
In 1998, Canaan Banana, the former president of Zimbabwe, was convicted of sodomy and indecent assault and served a prison sentence.
The list of many such cases goes on and on, including in Nigeria.
During these regimes, political leaders and military officers enjoyed near-absolute immunity from prosecution. Women, especially those in vulnerable positions (household workers, political aides, or journalists), were often subject to sexual coercion with little recourse for justice. These dynamics continued well into the democratic era that began in 1999.

Analysts have pointed out that in Nigeria, just as in other climes, the law against sexual abuse, encompassing rape and other forms of sexual violence, applies to everyone regardless of their position or status.
They say that while certain individuals like those in the military or with diplomatic immunity might have limited legal protections, they are still subject to the law in cases of sexual abuse.
According to them, the law’s application is not based on social status, but rather on the act of sexual violence itself.
The laws against sexual abuse, such as the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act (VAPP Act) (2015) and the Criminal Code, apply to all individuals in Nigeria, including those in positions of power or authority.
Over the years, several high-profile cases have sparked national outrage, but many never made it to court or were dismissed due to “lack of evidence,” political interference, or victim intimidation. Some examples include:
In 2019, a video surfaced showing a senator physically assaulting a woman in a sex toy shop in Abuja. Although initially convicted in a civil suit and fined, the criminal case was controversially dismissed.
His political career continued, and he faced no long-term consequences, illustrating the impunity often enjoyed by political elites.
Similarly, a senator in Nigeria’s Eighth Senate has faced multiple allegations of misconduct and abuse from various women, including those he dated or had professional dealings with.
Although he denied the allegations and no formal charges were brought, the stories have fueled broader conversations about entitlement, abuse, and misogyny within the political class.
The case of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s allegations against Senate President Godswill Akpabio is another matter begging for a re-evaluation of how complaints by female victims of sexual abuse should be handled.
March 21, 2025, one Ms. Felicia Ogbonna, a 21-year-old Nigerian, demanded government intervention and justice over an alleged serial sexual assault committed against her by a Lagos businessman (names withheld).
Speaking at a news conference, at a news conference organised by her lawyer, Mr Martin Agba, in Abuja on Friday, Ogbonna alleged that the suspect had repeatedly raped her, even with the knowledge of his wife.
Then, most recently is a new and explosive case that reveals the terrifying extent to which power can be used by the elite class to silence, shame, and destroy a woman who dares to speak the truth.
The case involves one Hadiza Musa Baffa, and the man she accuses is no less than a Senior Advocate of Nigeria and former minister who served under President Goodluck Jonathan.
Hadiza has alleged that the man not only abused her sexually, but also violated, manipulated, and trafficked her into sexual servitude. The list of such cases is endless, with many of them unreported due to fear of stigma.
While many such allegations remain unsubstantiated or anonymous due to fear of retaliation, numerous stories exist of female staffers being harassed or assaulted by state governors, top civil servants, or former military generals who transitioned into politics.
Meanwhile, Civil society organisations (CSOs) across Nigeria and Africa have been vocal in condemning sexual abuse and violence perpetrated by the elite, calling for urgent reforms and accountability.
Their statements highlight systemic issues, demand institutional changes, and emphasise the need for a cultural shift to ensure justice and equality.
For instance, Actionaid Nigeria has strongly condemned recent allegations of sexual harassment within the National Assembly and has demanded a thorough, independent, and transparent investigation into allegations of sexual abuse and violence, as well as elite impunity in order to uphold human rights and public trust.
Speaking in Abuja, ActionAid Nigeria’s Country Director, Andrew Mamedu, stated, “For fairness and to maintain public trust in the process, the Code of Conduct Bureau and the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) must work alongside the National Assembly’s Ethics Committee to conduct a full-scale investigation that meets international human rights standards.
“This investigation must determine the veracity of both past and recent allegations and ensure accountability for any wrongdoing.
“At the same time, if the accusations are found to be false or politically motivated, this must also be taken seriously, as false claims undermine genuine cases of harassment and the fight for justice.”
Mamedu called for the reinforcement of the protection for whistleblowers in cases of sexual abuse and intimidation.
‘‘Additionally, protection for whistleblowers and those who come forward with allegations must be reinforced to prevent intimidation or retaliation, including possible online bullying,” he said.
Similarly, Solidarity for African Women’s Rights (SOAWR), a coalition of more than 80 Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) across 33 African countries, advocating for the implementation of the Maputo Protocol, has emphasised the importance of holding political elites accountable for sexual violence and urges African governments to strengthen legal frameworks to protect women.
Also, Human Rights Watch has reported on the challenges faced by survivors of sexual violence in accessing justice, particularly when perpetrators are in positions of power.
They call for reforms to ensure that justice systems are accessible and responsive to the needs of survivors, regardless of the perpetrator’s status.
To bring an end to such elite impunity, or at least reduce it to the barest minimum, analysts have recommended the establishment of independent and autonomous bodies to investigate such cases of sexual abuse involving the elite.
They also called for the strict implementation of laws such as the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act and the Child Rights Act, as well as the creation of safeguards and enforcement of policies within political institutions to prevent sexual harassment and abuse.
They also believe that strategic awareness campaigns should be conducted to educate the public about women’s rights and the importance of holding perpetrators accountable.
According to them, legal and psychological support should be provided for survivors of sexual violence. (NANFeatures)(www.nannews.ng)

***If published please credit the writer and the News Agency of Nigeria.

Akpabio/Natasha: Vote of confidence and matters arising

Akpabio/Natasha: Vote of confidence and matters arising

By Naomi Sharang, News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)

The 10th Senate recently passed a vote of confidence in its President, Godswill Akpabio, amid the raging controversy over sexual harassment allegation.

The dispute started when Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central Senatorial District, accused Akpabio of sexual harassment and presented a petition to that effect.

The petition read in part: “I have a petition against the President of the Nigerian Senate over sexual harassment, abuse of office and malicious obstruction of my legislative functions.’’

Consequently, the petition was referred to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct and Public Petitions, chaired by Neda Imasuen.

The committee, after considering the matter, came up with its recommendations including a six months suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan.

The recommendations which were amended and approved by the upper legislative chamber are:

“That the Senate suspends Akpoti-Uduaghan for six months for her total violation of the Senate Standing rules 2023, as amended for bringing the Presiding officer and the entire Senate in general to public opprobrium.

“That the Senate should consider lifting the suspension or reducing the tenure of suspension if Akpoti-Uduaghan submits a written apology.

“That her salaries and allowances be suspended and withdrawal of all security details for the duration of her suspension.

“That for the period of her suspension, she be barred from presenting herself to the public locally and internationally as a Senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.’’

Nonetheless, some senators have reportedly distanced themselves from the suspension on the contention they were not allowed to review the final draft before it was presented on the floor of the Senate.

They alleged that the signatures attached to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension report were taken from the attendance register during one of their regular meetings.

Note, Akpoti-Uduaghan had approached the Federal High Court, seeking an order restraining the Senate Committee on Ethics and Privileges from investigating her.

Reacting to her suspension, Akpoti-Uduaghan, who prior to her interdiction, chaired the Senate Committee on Diaspora and NGOs, said that her unjust suspension from the Senate invalidated the principles of natural justice, fairness and equity.

“Against the culture of silence, intimidation and victim-shaming, my unjust suspension from the Nigerian Senate invalidates the principles of natural justice, fairness and equity.

“The illegal suspension does not withdraw my legitimacy as a senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and I will continue to use my duly elected position to serve my constituents and country to the best of my ability until 2027 and beyond.”

The embattled senator, afterwards, proceeded to the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) meeting held at the United Nations (UN) headquarters in New York to seek for justice and intervention from international democratic institutions.

Worthy of mention,  Akpabio is a member of the Executive Committee of the IPU.

The IPU’s primary purpose is to promote democratic governance, accountability and cooperation among its members.

At IPU, Akpoti-Uduaghan condemned her suspension and described it as an assault on democracy.

“This is a clear case of political victimisation, punishment for speaking out against impunity, corruption and gender-based violence,’’ she said.

Responding to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition, the President of the IPU, Tulia Ackson, said that the global parliamentary organisation had taken note of all the concerns raised but would also provide an opportunity for the Nigerian Senate to present its side of the story before taking any action.

However, the Chairperson of the House Committee on Women Affairs and Social Development, Kafilat Ogbara, who also spoke at the IPU, dismissed claims made by Akpoti-Uduaghan that she was suspended for raising allegations of sexual harassment against Akpabio.

Ogbara said she was mandated by the National Assembly to present a response to Akpoti-Uduaghan’s speech delivered at the 69th session of the United Nations Commission on the status of women.

Ogbara also read the position paper of the Senate by the Senate Leader, Sen. Opeyemi Bamidele.

The Senate letter read in part: “Akpoti-Uduaghan was suspended for gross misconduct and unruly behaviour and not as a result of allegation of sexual harassment or assault.

“The authority of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria firmly refutes the deliberate misinformation and false narrative being circulated by certain media organisations regarding the six-month suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan.’’

As the imbroglio unfolded, Bamidele sponsored a motion for a vote of confidence in Akpabio and was seconded by Deputy Minority Leader, Olalere Oyewumi.

Bamidele in the motion, cited Orders 41 and 51 of the Senate Standing Order and hinged the vote of confidence on Akpabio’s performance since the inauguration of 10th Senate, in spite of the sexual harassment narrative.

He said that the issue before the senate, as of the time it was referred to the Ethics and Privileges Committee, had nothing to do with sexual harassment.

“Some of the critics said this senate allowed Akpabio to be a judge of his own course and to preside over his own matter.

“With all due respect, the matter before us and on which Akpabio presided over as the President of the Senate had to do with a motion that was referred to the Senate Committee on Ethics, Code of Conduct and Public Petition.

“While we appreciate the concern of the public on this matter, I just want to emphasise that it is important that we also seek the understanding of the judgments.

“It is important to the general public that we were elected to serve the people and we are guided; whatever we do in this chamber, we are guided by rules,’’ he said.

Akpabio, in his remarks, thanked his colleagues for the vote of confidence passed on him.

He said that the 10th Senate was bound in purpose for the interest of Nigeria.

The Senate President said that Akpoti-Uduaghan had embarrassed the country by distorting the facts about her suspension at the IPU meeting.

Akpabio said Akpoti-Uduaghan gave a false narrative of the issue.

Prior to the vote of confidence passed on him, Akpabio had denied any attempt to sexually harass Akpoti-Uduaghan

“While I am aware that the matters are in court, however, I would like to state clearly that at no time did I ever attempt this sexual harassment of the said Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan or any other woman,’’ he said.

The Chairman, Senate Inter-Parliamentary Committee, Sen. Jimoh Ibrahim, lending his voice, said the IPU could not consider the petition suspended Akpoti-Uduaghan presented before it.

According to him,  Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition before the IPU “is dead on arrival”.

He said that the IPU could not consider petitions from individuals adding that Nigeria, rather than Akpoti-Uduaghan, was a member of the IPU.

“A petition can only be lodged against a member state by another member state; the suspended senator is not a member of the IPU, but Nigeria is; she cannot represent the Federal Republic of Nigeria,’’ he said.

Meanwhile, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has upbraided the Senate over Akpoti-Uduaghan suspension.

The PDP, in a reaction through its National Publicity Secretary, Debo Ologunagba, urged the Senate to redeem its image by conducting a thorough investigation on the allegation made against the Senate President.

“Given the widespread public concern over this sexual harassment allegation, which has already sparked protests at the National Assembly, the PDP urges the Senate to restore its credibility by immediately reinstating Akpoti-Uduaghan and ensuring an open investigation into the matter,’’ he said.

More so, an Abuja-based lawyer and human rights activist, Pelumi Olajengbesi, said the Senate President was entitled to the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

He argued that the handling of the matter had been neither honourable nor decent.

“It is an affront to justice, legal principles and to the Senate itself for the Senate President to preside over the suspension of Senator Natasha.

“In such circumstances, he should have respectfully stepped aside, allowing the Deputy Senate President to oversee the process, thereby ensuring impartiality and transparency.

“The credibility of the Senate is now at stake; the only honourable course of action is for the Senate President to step aside immediately so that an independent and transparent investigation can take place.

“Anything less is an insult to justice and a mockery of the institution he leads; such inaction erodes public confidence in our democracy and casts doubt on whether those in power are truly committed to the principles of justice and fairness.

“The world is watching; Nigeria must demonstrate that it is a nation governed by the rule of law—where no one, no matter how highly placed, is above accountability,’’ he said.

What’s more, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has approached the court to seek redress for Akpoti-Uduaghan.

SERAP is asking the court for “an order of mandamus to direct and compel Akpabio to rescind the unlawful suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan, reinstate her and fully restore all her legislative rights, entitlements and privileges.”

Political analysts say all parties should sheathe their swords and reach a common ground towards an amicable resolution of the standoff in order to save Nigeria further embarrassments.(NANfeatures)

***If used, please credit the writer and the News Agency of Nigeria.

X
Welcome to NAN
Need help? Choose an option below and let me be your assistant.
Email SubscriptionSite SearchSend Us Email